I was just curious. I havent spent a lot of time on the topic but it is interesting. My initial reaction is that an immoral act is any act that violates the consent of the affected individual. An exception must be made for punishing immoral acts.
This allows for relative morality, while not allowing things like genocide or theft or whatever. Thoughts?
I was just curious. I havent spent a lot of time on the topic but it is interesting. My initial reaction is that an immoral act is any act that violates the consent of the affected individual. An exception must be made for punishing immoral acts.
This allows for relative morality, while not allowing things like genocide or theft or whatever. Thoughts?