And I’ll show you YAML

(a continuation of this post)

  • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    For serializing? I’d probably just go with json.

    For content meant to be written or edited by humans? YAML all day baby

    • Andy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ever tried NestedText? It’s like basic YAML but everything is a string (types are up to the code that ingests it), and you never ever need to escape a character.

      • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got too many consumers that I don’t control which dictate their input formats. And to be quite honest, “types are up to the code that ingests it” sounds like a huge negative to me.

        • Andy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, well I love that policy (types being in code, not configs). FWIW I sometimes use it as a hand-edited document, with a small type-specifying file, to generate json/yaml/toml for other programs to load.