fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoFCC slaps $300M fine on “largest illegal robocall operation” it’s ever seenarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1783arrow-down113
arrow-up1770arrow-down1external-linkFCC slaps $300M fine on “largest illegal robocall operation” it’s ever seenarstechnica.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agoSo, what tiny fraction of their profits does this fine represent?
minus-squareultimate_question@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYa I appreciate the gesture but if this truly is the “biggest” robocall racket I have to imagine a 300M fine is a dropping the bucket
minus-squarePissinSelfNdriveway@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoNot Like they will pay it anyway.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNot like they’ll seriously be expected to.
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoProbably like 1%, maybe 2%
minus-squareubermeisters@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareRob T Firefly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat information does not appear in the article.
So, what tiny fraction of their profits does this fine represent?
Ya I appreciate the gesture but if this truly is the “biggest” robocall racket I have to imagine a 300M fine is a dropping the bucket
Not Like they will pay it anyway.
Not like they’ll seriously be expected to.
Probably like 1%, maybe 2%
deleted by creator
That information does not appear in the article.