• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not about taxes, not really. It’s the hypocritical and one-sided scrutiny of citizens vs corporations and the military industrial complex.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still wrong. Even when not about taxes directly.

      It demonstrates either ignorance about government responsibilities, ignorance about GAP, or combination of both.

      People passing this around should do better to come up with an applicable comparison regarding oversight the IRS has. There are many examples.

      But the IRS isn’t the GAO. Auditing the DoD will never be something the IRS handles.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok, so where is the missing 2 trillion dollars? You seem to be missing the forest for the trees. It’s about hypocrisy, not the highly specific functioning of an inept governmental office.

        Edit: I’ll spell out the hypocrisy. What happens when you fail an audit? You’re forced to pay back the money. What happens when the Pentagon fails their audits? Literally nothing. The 1990 bill has no penalties for failing, none.

        • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, so where is the missing 2 trillion dollars?

          That’s for the GAO to figure out. Not me or the IRS. The IRS is already understaffed and funded as is. And both the IRS and DoD are Executive branch. That’s why the audit authority rests with Congress to provide checks against Executive authority.

          You seem to be missing the forest for the trees. It’s about hypocrisy, not the highly specific functioning of an inept governmental office.

          If it’s only about hypocrisy there are still better examples. The DoD doesn’t generate revenue so there isn’t anything to tax. Meaning the IRS shouldn’t be involved.

          If to call out the DoD make it about how they expect this level of accountability with their own suppliers and staff that they’re failing. If to call out the IRS it could go with numerous options unrelated to the DoD.

          As is it doesn’t make sense.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The DoD doesn’t generate revenue so there isn’t anything to tax. Meaning the IRS shouldn’t be involved.

            I don’t know how else to say this. It’s not about specific agencies applying what penalty or anything else like that. It’s the fact that there are no penalties for the DoD for failing an audit.

            • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              So about my prior comment on ignorance of the government. Congress owns making penalties happen. As stated, this post suggests it’s the IRS not doing their job.

              You’re welcome to come up with an alternative interpretation of what’s plainly stated. But we can do better than misrepresenting the issues this post does a crappy job of bringing up.

              • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ok, I see where you’re coming from. I looked past the error to see the point of what they meant. You’re stating the obvious that the IRS isn’t involved with government agency audits. We’re arguing about 2 different things.

                • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not obvious unfortunately. Otherwise I wouldn’t bother.

                  People have been repeating versions of this same post across social media for weeks. With common replies asking why the IRS isn’t doing anything about it.

                  • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I have a follow up question, sorry to re-derail this, I’m also from elsewhere so have no idea about freedom financials and audits:

                    Even when the GAO completes their audit, will it really be of any use if every other line item reads “classified”: $stonkbucks?