• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but these are not the words of innocent men.

      Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung told Newsweek in a Saturday email that it is “unprofessional” to ask if the binder was sold to Russia. “What proof do you have?” he asked.

      • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        1 year ago

        It sounds like Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung also has no clue, but he’s seen this one enough times to know that his outright denial would probably be contradicted by Trump within the week.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah, the ol’ Criminal reverse burden/onus of proof. Counter with the old motherly trick, why might I have reason to even need to bring this up with you…

        What would Mary do/There’s something off about Mary…

      • AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It sounds like this story originated with Trump to create a fake news story to distract from the real news of his court cases.

      • Matt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s depressing that question is also applicable to the Biden impeachment hearings.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s applicable, but it’s also not being used because Biden didn’t do anything. You don’t say it’s unprofessional to ask the question and then ask what proof do you have, especially as a spokesperson. It’s ‘how to be ridiculous and look like you did it 101’.

    • AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This whole binder story smells like the kind of news stories we were fed during the early years of his presidency. It’s so 2017, throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks.

      We don’t need any new controversies. We need to see the felonies that have already been charged be prosecuted intelligently and effectively.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I don’t believe it, but only because he’s too incompetent to have kept that kind of high treason a secret.

      I absolutely would believe that he kept it with his poop magazines and it was stolen, or copied, by the Carpet King of Tampa, or a foreign intelligence asset. Either one is just as likely.

      • Slwh47696@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s honestly stupid enough that he’d be bragging about the money he made from the sale if he did sell it

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “I think NATO is going to be very surprised…I had the best Generals, they wouldn’t be surprised…the traitor generals who supported the election hoax and Joe Biden, they’ll be surprised because they aren’t good, okay, they’re bad, very bad. My dad, very smart, so smart, he always said sell your books when you’re done with them. Did you know binders are books? No one knew, but they are. I’m very smart and very good at deals. I make the deals, I sold a book for 50 million dollars, a book? Can you imagine? Joe Biden wouldn’t of gotten $20, so dumb. I got the most votes, ever, can you believe that?”

          That’s my point. I don’t believe he sold it to the Russians. I can absolutely believe that his actions directly lead to being aquired by foreign agents, or the Carpet King of Tampa.