• Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Except the mathematical variable name for radius is r. Also for a cylinder you use the term height, not thickness. Which is called h in math. So by all accounts it should be called Pirrh.

    Edit: Also also, with this logic you could’ve just called a pizza “Volume”. Would’ve saved you a lot of time :/

  • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the absolute ONLY case where it’s acceptable to call a pizza a pie. That being said, well done to the memesmith 😀

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      A deep dish pizza and a calzone are both technically pies as far as I can tell. They have a surrounding casing of crust. A flat pizza would not be a pie.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is the absolute ONLY case where it’s acceptable to call a pizza a pie.

      Never had deep dish, I take it?

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s actually a pie though. It has a surrounding crust casing as well as a filling, which qualifies it as a pie according to Wikipedia.

          • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Wikipedia is sometimes wrong, though. This is the relevant definition:

            A baked food composed of a pastry shell **filled with **fruit, meat, cheese, or other ingredients, and usually covered with a pastry crust

            Meaning that a flat pizza wouldn’t count (those are toppings, not fillings) but a calzone technically would.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Read further. The page also says the crust can be on the bottom and the filling on top/inside, as well as crust on top, filling underneath, or both (calzone). So a deep dish pizza is a pie, technically.

              • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                The page also says the crust can be on the bottom and the filling on top

                This is “literally can mean figuratively” level lunacy. If it doesn’t have FILLINGS rather than TOPPINGS, it’s simply not a pie.

                Next you’re gonna tell me that a hotdog is a sandwich (please fucking don’t!)

                • Victor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I don’t really know what you’re referring to at this point.

                  I’m saying:

                  • A regular flat pizza is not a pie. It does not have a casing, and the “filling” is a topping, as you say.
                  • A (Chicago-style) deep-dish pizza is a pie (more-so than a pizza in my opinion but whatever) because it has a bottom crust with filling on top (a pie according to Wikipedia). That’s not lunacy. It’s right there on Wikipedia, with even a link to Chicago-style deep-dish pizza.
                  • A calzone is a pie because it has crust both on top and on the bottom (surrounding the filling), as well as filling inside.

                  This is not “lunacy”. It’s just reading a definition and interpreting things to fit the definition. 🤷‍♂️ If you think that’s lunacy I’d hate to tell you about Pluto. A pie with crust on the bottom is very common. Meat pies, and pastry pies, among many others. Crust on bottom is common, crust on top is common. Crust all around is common… Not lunacy.

                  I’m going to refrain from talking about hotdogs, because I’ve yet to look up the definition of a sandwich, but I’d rather not at this point lol.

                • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If it’s not covered and doesn’t have FILLINGS rather than TOPPINGS, it’s simply not a pie.

                  Where does that put key lime pie and lemon meringue pie? Or pumpkin pie and pecan pie? Are they not pies because they’re not covered?

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not OP, but I never have, and not sure if I can get any in my area, but I would like to try it some day.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Get to Chicago, and don’t shy away from spinach. That shit’s delicious. I’m a fan of Giordano’s, but there’s a lot of valid argument about who does it best.

  • tjsauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It would be 2PiZA, since ZZ is Z squared EDIT: my bad, I was thinking of C

  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The parenthesis are pointless. Exponents go first, but multiplication doesn’t care about order, and there is only multiplication going on.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The parentheses are for clarification and thus not pointless. Know your audience. 🙂👍

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That Z² is equal to ZZ.

          If we didn’t use parentheses in primary school, because “the math doesn’t need it”, then it would be quite unnecessarily hard on the students’ learning. Maybe it’s a joke someone made for a class?

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            No, it is syntactically unnecessary.

            I understand your point, and agree when it comes to programming with things like scope, typing, semicolons, etc, etc… Many concepts are easier to learn when enforced through syntax.

            Though if someone gets cofused on the transitive nature of multiplication with a single simple equation … They aren’t learning math.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              How old are you? Do you remember how stupid we were when we were like, 12? How learning new shit really required over clarification ad nauseam seen through our eyes now? Teachers are really patient people.

              Anyway, this is just a joke post. Get over it. 🙂 Laugh at the funny. Instead of sucking it out of us. ❤️ The parentheses help make it look like the math is more advanced than it really is. It’s fine. Shhh. No no. Shhh. It’s supposed to be funny.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The Z axis is usually used for depth, so it’s going to be perpendicular to whatever your frame of reference (i.e. projection plane) is.

        If it’s upright in space, like a computer screen, the Z axis will be horizontal. If it’s a sheet of paper on a desk, then yes, I suppose it could be argued to be vertical instead.

        • experbia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          not consistently. I find there are basically two schools of thought in 3d graphics:

          • the screen is a graph representing a 3d space: the x axis is horizontal, the y axis is vertical. depth, going ‘into’ the screen, then becomes the z axis. mathematicians and programmers tend to like this.

          • the screen is a camera viewing a 3d space from within itself: the coordinates to position yourself along a line is one dimensional: x. to position yourself on a plane as in a 2d game, two dimensional: x, y. to position yourself within a volume, three dimensional: x, y, z. humans are kind of inherently planar spatial navigators - it’s easy to think about our position in terms of “where on the ground” we are, then adjust for height. 3d artists and level designers tend to like this.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ah I see. Thanks. I’m used to the first line of thought, as that’s what I’ve been using when doing 3D programming.

      • jaschen@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        All the 3D printer software, Z is vertical. But I only used a couple so I am not an expert.