This might even be an appropriate use for AI (maybe even running in-browser for privacy). I imagine something that reads your prompt and auto-populates a few rings to search. You review and edit the suggested rings, then click search.
New account since lemmyrs.org went down, other @Deebster
s are available.
This might even be an appropriate use for AI (maybe even running in-browser for privacy). I imagine something that reads your prompt and auto-populates a few rings to search. You review and edit the suggested rings, then click search.
I like the take that they have in that thread: Perforce is forking Puppet into a non-Open Source version (but they’re keeping the name).
That’s a six book series, if I remember rightly. I love Pratchett’s stuff (Men at Arms is next on my Discworld reread) but I was thinking of his solo stuff. Normally I just start at the first published if I think I’ll enjoy the whole lot.
I haven’t read anything by him, where is a good place to start? Here?
Using leaf tea instead of bags means it’s more forgiving of over brewing. I’ve always assumed it’s because you have large pieces instead of the smaller bits plus dust you get in bags, but I have no idea really.
That’s the first argument they make in their petition.
The oldest known container: github.com/bib/Jonah/Dockerfile
I thought we were finally agreeing fully! My understanding of the question is “what is the difference between a third (of a pizza, say) and a half?”
1/2 - 1/3 = 1/6
1/2 = 1/3 + 1/6
a half is one sixth more than a third.
btw, I fixed my Kagi screenshot since I’d missed a word from the question (reading comprehension’s clearly not my strong point today)
Ah, you’re right - I misunderstood jbrain’s point to just be about the “relative to the original” understanding. Guess I’m no smarter than Google’s AI.
Yes, and the Google AI response is correct (and quite clear) in what it says. edit: Thanks Batman. I mean that Google’s understanding of the question is logical (although still the maths is wrong as you say (now I’ve re-read you)) and its answer explained the angle it was answering from.
However, I think the reasonable assumption for the intention behind the question is relative to a whole. I had third of a pizza, and now I have an extra sixth of a pizza. It’s subtle, but that’s the kind of thing AI falls down on.
Google’s AI seems dumber than the rest, for example here’s Kagi answering the same (using Claude):
edit: typoed question originally
Perhaps Google’s tried to make it run too cheaply - Kagi’s one doesn’t run unless you ask for it, and as a paid product it’ll have different priorities.
While I don’t disagree, this article is pretty bad and unconvincing. Is it a draft or something dashed out to collect referral fees?
Vulnerable: VHD PTZ camera firmware < 6.3.40 used in PTZOptics, Multicam Systems SAS, and SMTAV Corporation devices based on Hisilicon Hi3516A V600 SoC V60, V61, and V63
It looks like they’re using AI correctly: to identify patterns in huge amounts of data.
I think they’d struggle to mention their own name more often in that article.
I think there’s a lot of people who would be happy with a Chromebook in computer form, and those are also the market for Linux.
sweet stop
I think you mean sweet spot. Now I’m wondering if it’s a typo or an eggcorn.
My (ISO) keyboards do, under the Esc key. I guess you’re in North America (or Australia) and have an ANSI layout.
Ah yeah, missed that 🤦♂️
Because this is the internet, I can’t tell if the whoosh goes to your downvoters or you. I think you were joking, but that second sentence makes me wonder…
I was going to post this myself, but you beat me to it. Great video.