I use Arch, btw.

What happens if the man does not pay? Will they put him in jail?

“open core” is pretty much “proprietary, but we won’t call it like that, we will also sue you if you use our code”

What’s AltaVista then?

Does it support logging in to YouTube to have access to purchased content, premium content, subscribers-only content, etc?

1. An actual reading mode: And Pocket integration
2. Better PDF handling: Chrome is as basic as it gets
3. Better performance: Based on our testing, at least
4. Most of your extensions are still available: Firefox uses the same extension platform
5. The privacy: Google doesn’t care about it
6. Protecting an open internet: Mozilla is the last major player standing up to Chromium

I should’ve had that backed up

Absolutely! IT’s time to check out Stow now. With this you can easily manage your configuration and dotfiles (and all other data) in a single location.

https://venthur.de/2021-12-19-managing-dotfiles-with-stow.html

Honestly, before I’m done setting up a debugger and creating breakpoints, etc. I have added 10 consle.log() at assumed failure points and run the code again two times.

Except Edge is Chromium based.

They chose Chromium. Which is the base for Chrome (and all other relevant browsers).

Technologically inferior to other browsers? What other browsers? Firefox?

Oh, different keyboard …

Itrieditandiamnothappythatthereisnospacebaronthatkeyboard.

I know how shared webhosting works. This is why I wonder why the author thinks containers and chroots are the same thing.

I’m sorry, but the only spaghetti you get is a 17 levels deep if clause.

So they say I can run a dozen of different web applications on the same machine all on the same port internally and different port externally and have a reverse proxy forwarding the traffic to the correct port based on the hostname it was called with by simply using a bunch of chrooted environments?

You can’t spell “functional programming” without “fun”.

Repeat after me: public static void main(String[] args)

But also because users apparently never use the power button on a Mac

Because people who can afford a Mac can also afford the energy bill for having a computer running or standbying 24/7?

*scnr*

Since we’re here

What you guys are referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux. Thank you for taking your time to cooperate with with me, your friendly GNU+Linux neighbor, Richard Stallman.