99% of stats are wrong.

Old news. Already seen half a dozen posts about this yesterday

Off to check if ‘civil war in the USA’ is on my bingo card.

About as close as we are to nuclear fusion. AI generation of shit will always be one step ahead of AI detection

Well, that’s Indonesia off my list of holiday destinations then

Unfortunately not on ios, but thank you

Paywalled link

Thanks for the non-paywalled article. It produces absolutely no evidence though. or even an explanation or theory. One mention of benzene, which is a well known dangerous substance, but also highly flammable. So unlikely to be produced by burning any gas, and no link to a source. So that sounds like scaremongering to me. If anyone knows how to make benzene out of methane, let me know and we’ll patent the process. The one link to ‘research’ is one that just shows correlation, not causation.

To be fair, that is probably up to Ukraine. Except that we aren’t offering those NATO brigades. I wish we would.

Juicy targets if they all gather around their interpreter.

Go touch a cow. How hard is it to check a dozen fraudulent votes and work out who these votes were for. I’m willing to bet they are not for ‘both sides’

I know, but it just sounds too euphemistic

Can we not call it genocide, or murder? Cleansing doesn’t sound right

Voyager on iOS has keyword filters

You should read up on non verbal communication. As an older boomer, I am perfectly happy with working from home and a catch up on zoom/teams/slack with my team 99% of the time, and very much against return to office. But sometimes I do need face to face communication with team members I’m concerned about, or with customers.

Not a word on what it is or how it works. Marketing hype most likely.

I don’t disagree, but it’s probably not that easy. Universities in my country don’t have the resources anymore to do many orals, and depending on the subject exams don’t test the same skills as coursework.

Build a wall around the US. We’ll pay, the amount of stupidity leaking out is problematic. (Apologies to the sensible and nice people that live there)

It’s not just the internet. For example, students are handing in essays straight from ChatGPT. Uni scanners flag it and the students may fail. But there is no good evidence either side, the uni side detection is unreliable (and unlikely to improve on false positives, or negatives for that matter) and it’s hard for the student to prove they did not use an LLM. Job seekers send in LLM generated letters. Consultants probably give LLM based reports to clients. We’re doomed.

You are mother? U r not making yourself very clear here