ElleChaise

Maybe what they meant was that it’s one of those things the government had to approve, similar to when big companies merge and the SEC has to weigh in first. Just a guess.

You think that’s bad, you should take a gander at the official news sources in Jacksonville Florida. I don’t know if they’re still this bad, but as I recall they have not one, but at least two big news publications, both produce articles that look like they were written by grade schoolers. Anything that wasn’t copy/pasted from the AP seems to be written hastily by somebody who dropped out before understanding English. I’m sure many other cities have the same issue. The one is called news five or Jax 5 news, and the other is first coast news. They’ll hire anybody to write apparently.

Oh yeah? Well… If we were both birds, and I was flying next to you while you were also flying as well, and, and you said to me that I had to carry your school books, well then that’d make you look bad… So… So I win, and you’re wrong, and dumb, and I’m like really super smart for coming up with this example impromptu.

The dude who repairs clothes must be pissed.

These clowns are totally delusional!

Tyrants must be quelled. The law is breaking down around us. Be safe out there, folks.

But then who will bot the botmen?!

At this point, doctors being rich is an out of date stereotype from before today’s rich guys screwed us, and the doctors, out of the good economy we would’ve had. This is the fundamental misunderstanding holding the idea back from mainstream audiences, they seem to believe “eat the rich” means literally to destroy anybody who makes as much as a doctor or lawyer makes, forgetting these are simply further examples of often abused workers, same as the person cobbling shoes, welding, cooking, whatever.

Not to mention learning about reality is banned in schools now.

It’s funny how saying “I want to stand a fair chance against an armed fascist uprising” is a controversial statement these days. It’s as though most people think we can simply wish away any person out to attack us, with no armed citizens, and no functioning criminal system, and a real chance for brown shirt-like activity under a dictator. Come on people, we can take some fascists in a fight. Just got to step up, be strong, and don’t let the propaganda get ya mixed up.

I don’t think the premise holds water.

How can one have congressional support for an issue which actually helps people? Is helping people, in this instance, the most profitable choice for the individual representative? Because they do not care about the betterment of humankind, and they are no longer beholden to the people. The representative at large is a warmongor, an oil baron beneficiary, a gun lobby shill, a two-bit huckster, a thief, and an active erodor of democratic principles. There is no such thing as congressional support among two opposing parties, whose real goals both are aligned against the people, in that, again… If helping people isn’t the number one most convenient, profitable, best way to get somebody else’s ass kissed, it ain’t even a priority. We need to do something about the fascism problem first, then melt the guns into participation trophies for the men who carry them now. Problem solved.

The psychos see what happens in places where the ruling class gets what they want at all costs, and they still want the juice. Says everything you need to know about society.

Merriam-Webster.

Lotta good people you’re throwing out with the bathwater there, but fuck 'em, I guess. You’re stoking the flames whose destruction you condemn.

Here’s a comment for contradiction’s sake. May your online days be merry and full of commentary.

I can think of a few, but right off top: most people won’t be eligible, won’t get in, or will be otherwise stipilated out after the fact. Secondly, this type of fund is typically a massive donation, which hypothetically equates to a massive tax write off for the donator. Thirdly (and admitted tinfoil-hattedly), this is gonna piss off a ton of unaffected Republicans made to believe this is like letting commies come right into their living rooms to fuck their wives while they watch.

Are you now claiming that the Zionist movement does not consist of Israeli Jews?

Reverse the order and the same can be said. Free speech has been abused to allow bad actors to rally for the death of people they don’t approve of. By your own logic, this is enough reason to support the issue.

Many people have said the same, and many people have died. Please take the words of this comment section into your mind and give it a second thought. Nazis can’t share the same privilege to “speak freely” when they only conduct hate speech to rally others to harm people. That’s regulated in a million ways; basically obscenity laws only exist because we don’t want Nazis to.

Nobody said these were good Nazis.