We should be opposed to significant* age gaps in principle because we cannot trust the person who has power in the relationship, nor the one who doesn’t, to determine if the relationship is healthy or dangerous.

*honestly, the 1/2 + 7 meme is shockingly accurate at determining this

Yeah, community servers being used as forum-like things is an issue

Ultimately, it’s because the foundational ideas of communism don’t scale.

He should reject her because he should be opposed to such a large age gap. FWIW this fails the half + 7 rule by a LOT (5.5 years).

1. Sell these musical slots to artists for a few million apiece

2. Profit

Yes, I mean an axis break to denote that part of the axis has been omitted. Using it to show a gap between 0 and the lowest included data in the dataset is very common and is a proper use even according to your own source:

A zigzag on the line of the x- or y-axis in a line or a bar graph indicating that the data being displayed does not include all of the values that exist on the number line being used

Beginning the Y axis at 0 and using an axis break to go from there to 7 million allows you to see the same amount of detail as you can in the OP, while visually signalling to the reader that the scale on that axis does not show a full 0 to 10 million range. This increases the chance that they’ll read the graph correctly. You can justifiably blame someone for reading it wrong, but the point of a graph is to communicate, so minimizing the chance for misinterpretation is a good idea.

As soon as a democrat does it, everyone suddenly cares? We should do this more often, clearly the magats need to see an example before they’ll agree to fix the loopholes.

Think? Why would they do that?

Yup

This reading comprehension joke it overused and it doesn’t even make sense here. It’s well-known that you need at least one of those little zigzag indicators when the graph doesn’t start at 0 in most cases to avoid people misinterpreting the graph and to make it much more visually clear.

Wikipedia and a lot of games. A bunch of programming tools and libraries. My Spotify playlist. Video is the least efficient so you’d have to limit that a lot.

So true, I don’t know shit I have a lot to say (lmao I’m gonna stop it there that’s PERFECT)

This isn’t plausible yet, we don’t even know enough about the brain to simulate it even if we had the computing power. Possible within the next 60 years? I guess, but not guaranteed.

It’s already easy enough to socially engineer politicians, let’s not make it easier

I thought you were supposed to throw the hammer at the nail

This meme feels personalized for me. Glad so many others watched Castle in the Sky, it’s a great movie

Thank you spujb, you’re very helpful :)

There’s room for a few issues at once. Gender still plays an important social role and I won’t stop anyone from fighting for justice just because it’s not my one chosen issue.

i just don’t like something instant, i do enjoy the process of everything that i do though

Exactly; the process itself feels good. I hope you continue to enjoy it.

just asking for opinion here, all opinions are welcome

By declaring all opinions on a factual topic equally valid, you’re giving the same weight to reality as you do to misinformation. I do not welcome misinformation. This may seem close-minded, but having an open mind doesn’t mean accepting everything as equally true.