Oooh… that’s what Spirit forgot to do. Beat up their passengers. They were offering an incomplete experience.

Gee, it’s almost like offering absolute shit service, making everything an additional fee, constantly canceling flights, and never being on-time is a poor business model. Who knew?

Evil phase? No, it’s draw phase, standby phase, main phase 1, battle phase, main phase 2, end phase.

LOL. You’re right, if they make Massachusetts worse than Oklahoma then Oklahoma’s ranking would improve! I never thought about that. BRILLIANT!

I hate having to explain this to people when I talk about the insane cost of healthcare in the US.

“but US healthcare is the best so of course it’s going to be the most expensive”

No, you moron. It’s the exact same procedure by equally qualified doctors using the same equipment.

In case you’re wondering why you’re getting down voted, it’s because you didn’t even offer up a valid argument and instead engaged in ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy.

I get that correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but if the richest states are almost all blue and the poorest ones almost all red, that is a very strong correlation and trying to claim it is insignificant only makes you seem the fool.

You seem to be intelligent. Ask yourself why this post made you so upset.

First of all, “all counties were red/blue” is not what “unanimous” means.

I agree with you there.

Second of all, I don’t think “ha ha your state is poor” is the grand slam argument you think it is.

Takes a lot of mental gymnastics to boil down all the listed differences as “state is poor”. Unless you mean “poor” as in “in bad shape” and not “economically suffering”. I’ll assume you mean the former as that’s the only way your argument makes sense.

I think it’s more about how a state is voting against its own interests. There is NOTHING about the Republican platform that would improve any of the listed metrics. If anything, Republican politics would only further worsen an already bad state of affairs.

And of the off chance your initial argument was entirely economic, it’s Democrats who want federal government involvement to help poor states.

How I imagine Elon’s taking the news:

Yeah. And if we’re being honest, I don’t like the Season Pass nonsense. Oh yay, 2 extra tractors and a harvester that probably should’ve been in the base game.

I think FS19 was my “countless hours” version. I did like the FS22 improvements, but since all my mods didn’t work initially it felt like a step backwards.

I’ll probably wait for a sale.

And yeah, I’m not going to be upset that people don’t like the game. It’s not even my favorite game. Even I think it’s stupid sometimes. But for a relaxing turn my brain off and chill experience, it does that pretty well.

We could argue whether the updates and improvements are worth it, and that’s a valid argument, but you admittedly have never purchased it nor will you purchase it. And that’s fine. Enjoy something else, buddy :)

It’s not my favorite game but your post was so egregiously wrong I thought you must have known nothing about the game itself and just made bad assumptions.

3 years is quite a long time to iterate.

I cannot even shape my head around your comment here. In your head one year isn’t enough time to make any significant changes to a game but three years is quite a long time?

Anyway, you admitted you were wrong and/or lied and that’s enough for me.

It’s just the year of release or thereabouts. Lots of software does this, even without yearly release. Microsoft Office did it, for example. But it’s actually pretty common with simulation games. Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024. Car Mechanic Simulator 2021. Trainz Railroad Simulator 2022.

It’s strange that EA has poisoned our minds about putting the year in the title from their obvious yearly slop.

Also, I don’t blame you for not liking the game. It’s not for everyone. Not like I’m going to be upset by that XD

Verifiably false. First of all, they don’t even release a game every year. Last one was Farm Sim 22. Before that it was 19.

There have been lots of gameplay additions from adding whole industries like logging and ranching to the game. Not to mention the graphics and physics improvements.

It’s not just reskinned crops and a number bump. But hey, this game clearly isn’t for you.

It’s not a yearly release. The last one was Farming Simulator 22, so it’s been three years. Before that it was 19, another 3 years.

I know it’s easy to hate on Farm Sim but yearly cash-grab releases is not one of them.

Part of it is that there’s less hidden costs. I like it when it’s just “the total is $30” instead of “there’s $8 shipping and a $2 service fee and then $4 in taxes and…”

I’ve also seen some online stores lure in a customer with a really cheap initial price and then on the last page just slam them with insane shipping and handling fees hoping that the customer either doesn’t notice or feels too invested at this point to cancel their purchase.

But yes, part of it is also people are stupid when they see the word “free” as if the store wouldn’t move the cost somewhere else.

This tracks pretty hard.

After hearing about how big a flop the Borderlands movie was, I decided to watch it.

It was so abysmally bad I took psychic damage. Days latter I’m still wondering how anyone could have made those script decisions unless they were actively sabotaging the project.

I was unable to sleep one night so I starting making a YouTube video about how terrible the movie was. I’d say I’m at level 53.

No he fucking didn’t. People voted for Trump specifically. If Trump isn’t running, the political map will be quite different.

We know. They didn’t work during his first term. They won’t work now.

Laughs in TrueNAS

Breed them out of existence.