Absurdist, Security Architect (Magician), Beer and Bourbon connoisseur, Gamer, lover of Dark Humor (Lovecraft was a comedian), Maker, Apistevist, Agnostic, Atheist.

  • 49 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle


  • “I think you’re just playing bad games…”

    Like Baldur’s Gate 3?

    “Where it’s predatory it sucks” - The literal definition of microtransactions.

    I think we’re done here. You think video gaming is what’s happened in the past ten years. I played my first video game in 1979 on an Atari 2600. I remember Pacman fever, I lived in California during it. I remember when Space Ace and Dragoons Lair came out in the arcades and cost .50 instead of a quarter…

    Tell me again how I’m “just playing bad games…” You just can’t see the forest for the trees…



  • There’s a problem with your starting point.

    We were talking about microtransactions. You jumped to free to play.

    Not all games that have microtransactions are fre to play.

    So you’ve lied again. Not as easy you thought.

    What you need to do is grab ALL games with microtransactions. You need to grab stats on ALL free games. You need to grab stats on hidden cost games (also called free to play).

    Try again junior.

    And try thinking this time.


  • Okay, let’s think critically.

    “I’ve been able to play games for free because of microtransactions”

    Microtransactions cost money, that’s not free. What you are saying here is you got to play a game without supporting the devs while OTHER people paid for microtransactions.

    You assume incorrectly, I support devs by buying games, not supporting microtransactions.

    “Most of the most popular games in the world are free…” First, like hell. Show me stats that support a claim that MOST popular games are free. Second, if a game is supported by microtransactions, you’re lying if you say it’s free. MICROTRANSACTIONS ARE NOT FREE.

    Next “I have purposely bought microtransactions to support the developer…” I support the dev by buying the game.

    Microtransactions make a good game bad, and bad games worse. None of what you said made an argument for microtransactions. Microtransactions encourage devs to hide fixes behind pay walls, even small ones.

    My statements weren’t kneejerk. Your nonsense obviously wasn’t even thought through as it’s internally inconsistent.

    I look forward to you trying again.



  • MrEUser@lemmy.ninjatoGames@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m thinking of all the times I’ve said, “You know what makes this game great? The microtransactions.” All ZERO times.

    There are bad games and good games. Microtransactions make bad games worse AND good games worse. I intentionally only pay for games without microtransactions. THEY move the game from “I’m interested” (like with the rerelease of dungeon keeper) to “Well, I can play the OG version on GOG. Without microtransactions, I’ll do that.”

    That business model ONLY works out for the business. It is NOT for the best interest of the customer.

    So while what you said is right, you are incorrect.



  • You started by asking the definition of boomer shooter, which I responded to. Then you added the fact Doom 3 came out in 2005. Since your context was, “what’s the definition of a boomer shooter.” I responded to that.

    Maybe next time frame your question better to get the information you’re looking for?


  • A game is called a boomer shooter based on several criteria. Usually they’re first person. Does that mean a third person shooter can’t be a “boomer shooter”? No.

    Quake III is just one game that boomer shooters are based on. Doom (1993) is a game that boomer shooters are based on too. Neither one is a boomer shooter itself. A Boomer Shooter is a modern creation meant to replicate past play style, video style, and audio style too… It’s more than just “pixelated/voxelated…”









  • Pull up a list of Lemmy instances with 100% uptime. That’s not a big list. Look for a location in the U.S. you find an even smaller list. And if your monolingual and speak English bestest… well, then you’re in the realm of a vary small list indeed.

    lemmy.ninja is second on that list for size AND speed of growth. Plus, where else are you going to find communities that teach you how to use the Fediverse to your advantage? Drop by and subscribe to the boomer shooter community… We all know they did it right in lo-fi…




















  • One of the problems I see with this community on lemmy.world…

    lemmy.world is one of the largest lemmy sites. Yet when you look in this community, no body interacts. Most posts have no upvotes ore one downvote… nobody comments… it’s dead in here. From the outside it looks like this is where gaming conversation goes to die.

    Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe you should write an article on it.

    I won’t even bother cross posting here anymore because an article that takes hours to write and time to assemble to look good, about the next six boomer shooters coming out over the next six months gets a downvote, no posts, and disappears into the ether…

    Where on two other active game communities it’s upvoted and talked about, which gives me a reason to post.


  • I like the term boomer shooter. The reason is the alliteration. But more importantly…

    • Rookie Level 1 Gamer: “They’re called boomer shooters because they’re old like baby boomers”
    • Veteran Level 20 Gamer: “Baby boomers thought Doom was satanic, that’s a stupid term”
    • Enlightened Level 60 Gamer: “They’re called boomer shooters because of the huge debt they owe to the original Doom modding scene and therefore “Boom”, one of the first limit-removing source ports”
    • GigaChad Level 80 gamer: “Who cares. My ego isn’t so delicate as to have my sensibilities offended by whatever the fuck you want to call it. If you think something like ‘MyHouse.wad’ is something that is for “bOoMeRs” (a.k.a. anyone old enough to know that it’s called a “VCR,” not a “VHS player”) then you’re the one missing out… not me.”

    Credit to @smart_boy@beehaw.org and @133+.pk3@geocities.ytmnd.com


  • I know.

    And I’m sorry for using you as the sacrificial lamb.

    You have every right to ask the question, and you even did it reasonably.

    I find it interesting that when I spend time writing an article and cross posting it, this is the level of vitriol I receive. It’s over the top and no one deserves this, especially someone that is just asking…

    “Hey, what does anyone think about X?”

    Least of all anyone that took their own time to publish something to spark discussion. Thank you for doing that. Thank you for not just posting a link to an article. Thank you for spending some time, considering, and then engaging.

    I wish more people were inclined to do that. More people should rush to your defense for what I posted. Some people should even learn from it. Sadly, I doubt that will happen.

    I honestly wish you well and hope you will post again in the future. I look forward to what you have to say.