Whewee tesseract is fancy lewking! Here’s to hoping you have no shortfalls to cover!

That’s too bad. I was hoping for a Mao style Culture Revolution.

That’s true. I was just reading about the Somoza dictatorship. That mofo shot up the houses of his most fervent voters.

It’s just disappointing anyone expected anything more than more genocide out of him.

I was gonna chill with you but I guess you’re just a troll on this shit. Too bad. Blocking you’re sad ass.

No shit Sherlock. I guess you don’t understand how much I understand. Nice.

I think part of the part he loves about the presidency is he gets to talk to all the dictators he loves. It’s like a trip to Disneyland to him where he goes to meet all the villains.

Well obviously.

Yea. Do we really need to ask who would do such a thing?

Trump thinks he can just replace whoever he wants, globally. I really hope the Mexican cartels take care of him sooner rather than later.

ok kid

no

we’ll see

Yea. Surprised it isn’t bigger news at least in the social media circles. There was this post on Jan 20th here: https://sh.itjust.works/post/31381451. Which lead me to read this letter a bunch of high level security officials sent to Harris … which apparently fell on dead ears, here: https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/letter-to-vp-harris-111324-1.pdf … and as much as I fucking hate conspiracy theories and the people behind them, there was this data analyst who made an extremely compelling data backed argument here: https://youtu.be/QDWwLDejg8Y?si=y_ckplWhEzun8nvq

That being said. An amount of Americans and their politicians can suck dicks.

I’ll repaste what I just replied to you…

While it’s true that both Russia and the United States have engaged in foreign interference, Russia’s approach has been notably different and more pervasive in recent years.

Russia’s election interference efforts have indeed been systematic and far-reaching, often focusing on fanning extremism and undermining democratic institutions rather than direct regime change. Key aspects of Russia’s approach include:

1. Global reach: Russian interference has been documented in elections across Europe, the United States, and beyond.

2. Digital tactics: Russia has extensively used cyberattacks, hack-and-leak operations, and online disinformation campaigns to influence elections.

3. Promoting division: Russian efforts often aim to exacerbate existing societal divisions and promote extremist views, including far-right ideologies.

4. Long-term strategy: Russia’s interference is part of a broader geopolitical strategy to weaken adversaries by creating doubt, uncertainty, and distrust in democratic institutions.

5. Evolving sophistication: Russian tactics have become more advanced over time, adapting to new technologies and countermeasures.

While the United States has historically engaged in foreign interventions, often involving regime change through military means, Russia’s recent approach has been more focused on covert influence operations that don’t necessarily involve direct military action. This strategy allows Russia to impact a larger number of countries simultaneously with less risk of direct confrontation.

The scale and persistence of Russian election interference in the last decade have made it a significant global concern, prompting increased awareness and countermeasures from many democratic nations. This widespread and ongoing campaign of influence distinguishes Russia’s recent activities from those of other nations, including the United States, in terms of its scope and potential long-term impact on global democracy.

Citations: [1] https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2019-11-13/russian-interference-threatens-elections-across-the-world-including-ours/ [2] https://www.csis.org/blogs/strategic-technologies-blog/russia-ramps-global-elections-interference-lessons-united-states [3] https://il.boell.org/en/2022/01/25/global-story-election-interference [4] https://news.yale.edu/2020/08/20/rigged-details-long-history-russian-and-us-electoral-interference [5] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-intelligence-report-alleging-russia-election-interference-shared-with-100-2023-10-20/ [6] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-disrupts-covert-russian-government-sponsored-foreign-malign-influence [7] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more [8] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/01/05/russia-has-been-meddling-in-foreign-elections-for-decades-has-it-made-a-difference/

Well… and then there’s the now published interference with the voting machines in the swing states that Harris did nothing about. I almost wonder if those 13 million would have come out, would it even have mattered? I understand SCOTUS would’ve said ok so what? But even a fucking requested recount to show there was fuckery going on would’ve at least been the documentation we needed to see to move ahead down the road.

While it’s true that both Russia and the United States have engaged in foreign interference, Russia’s approach has been notably different and more pervasive in recent years.

Russia’s election interference efforts have indeed been systematic and far-reaching, often focusing on fanning extremism and undermining democratic institutions rather than direct regime change. Key aspects of Russia’s approach include:

1. Global reach: Russian interference has been documented in elections across Europe, the United States, and beyond.

2. Digital tactics: Russia has extensively used cyberattacks, hack-and-leak operations, and online disinformation campaigns to influence elections.

3. Promoting division: Russian efforts often aim to exacerbate existing societal divisions and promote extremist views, including far-right ideologies.

4. Long-term strategy: Russia’s interference is part of a broader geopolitical strategy to weaken adversaries by creating doubt, uncertainty, and distrust in democratic institutions.

5. Evolving sophistication: Russian tactics have become more advanced over time, adapting to new technologies and countermeasures.

While the United States has historically engaged in foreign interventions, often involving regime change through military means, Russia’s recent approach has been more focused on covert influence operations that don’t necessarily involve direct military action. This strategy allows Russia to impact a larger number of countries simultaneously with less risk of direct confrontation.

The scale and persistence of Russian election interference in the last decade have made it a significant global concern, prompting increased awareness and countermeasures from many democratic nations. This widespread and ongoing campaign of influence distinguishes Russia’s recent activities from those of other nations, including the United States, in terms of its scope and potential long-term impact on global democracy.

Citations: [1] https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2019-11-13/russian-interference-threatens-elections-across-the-world-including-ours/ [2] https://www.csis.org/blogs/strategic-technologies-blog/russia-ramps-global-elections-interference-lessons-united-states [3] https://il.boell.org/en/2022/01/25/global-story-election-interference [4] https://news.yale.edu/2020/08/20/rigged-details-long-history-russian-and-us-electoral-interference [5] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-intelligence-report-alleging-russia-election-interference-shared-with-100-2023-10-20/ [6] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-disrupts-covert-russian-government-sponsored-foreign-malign-influence [7] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/new-evidence-shows-how-russias-election-interference-has-gotten-more [8] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/01/05/russia-has-been-meddling-in-foreign-elections-for-decades-has-it-made-a-difference/

I guess we can put a wager. $10 on things don’t go fully the bully’s way.

“We know we’re in the wrong. What are you gonna do about it?” ffff