Not-so-fun fact: He’ll have to be rescued with taxpayer money
Also horse: sprains ankle on some stick
CEO of a company that makes the computer part that is most important for gamers. He has a net worth of about 100 billion USD
Their products are currently better than the competition and they make full use of their position.
They are known for very high prices, scummy marketing tricks, and abusing their small business partners.
The company briefly overtook Apple and Microsoft, becoming the most valuable company at around 3 trillion USD.
If you’re looking for an apartment try searching for housing co-ops.
They operate as non-profit so the rent is lower, and if you have problems they tend to be easier to work with as well
And what do they offer over flatpak?
The point is to take care of your hygiene, if showering less is enough for you that’s great
You can claw back a bit by using cash and privacyguides.org
Ouch
Ok I can agree with that
Your comment is very nuanced btw
Good point
I’m not defending Nazis? I just disagree with the post, which I understood calls for people to dismiss nuance and engage a black and white view. Which smells like populism to me
No you did not follow the Morgentau Plan. Instead you gave Germany a bunch of money to rebuild under the Marshall Plan, and treated us quite kindly to lead us on the right path. (In contrast to the USSR which took revenge by letting their soldiers rape and loot, and disassembled German industries as repayment. The Soviets also tried to forcibly “denazify” Germany which was unsucsessful.)
No, we strangled the ones in charge and then […]
So we agree that there is a difference between Nazis of different caliber, and they’re to be treated differently.
Thank you for your nuanced reply and your openness for semantics discussion.
Provocative question: Do you think then that the US should’ve strangled half the German population instead of just a dozen at the Nuremberg Trials because a Nazi is a Nazi?
Ah yes removing nuance, always a win.
This list is conveniently leaving out the motive of ‘being threatened’, because motives do sometimes matter.
The proper term is “nazi-collaborateur”.
And no I am of course not condoning any violence.
No no Hitler only wanted to kill part of the slavic population to make it easier to enslave the rest as workers, unlike Israel who are killing everybody
DF gets points dedacted for missing the ü dots on both, looks absolutely stupid to a german speaker