cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions

  • 159 Posts
  • 591 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2022

help-circle











  • I was referring to the “Zelensky actually changed this” part of the message I was replying to. What do you think that means, if not that they forgot when he became president?

    The only other explanation I can imagine is that maybe they meant to imply that Poroshenko was in Putin’s pocket, but that seems unlikely (and is also i assume not what you inferred since you replied with a link from before his presidency).


















  • big oof.

    We can conclude: that photo isn’t AI-generated. You can’t get an AI system to generate photos of an existing location; it’s just not possible given the current state of the art.

    the author of this substack is woefully misinformed about the state of technology 🤦

    it has, in fact, been possible for several years already for anyone to quickly generate convincing images (not to mention videos) of fictional scenes in real locations with very little effort.

    The photograph—which appeared on the Associated Press feed, I think—was simply taken from a higher vantage point.

    Wow, it keeps getting worse. They’re going full CSI on this photo, drawing a circle around a building on google street view where they think the photographer might have been, but they aren’t even going to bother to try to confirm their vague memory of having seen AP publishing it? wtf?

    Fwiw, I also thought the image looked a little neural network-y (something about the slightly less-straight-than-they-used-to-be lines of some of the vehicles) so i spent a few seconds doing a reverse image search and found this snopes page from which i am convinced that that particular pileup of cars really did happen as it was also photographed by multiple other people.