disposabletentacle

I can’t believe that we have reached the point as a civilization where I’m legitimately not sure whether or not this was intended as satire.

Hmm. Putting your “My Folder” right there on the desktop for everyone to see. A brave choice…

Nah, it’s the guy farthest back on the left. It may look small, but that’s just foreshortening/perspective and also because it’s curved.

There’s a ton of wholesome consensual adult-angled 2D stuff out there. Like a ton. The concept of hentai as all underage rape fantasy is a myth. Plus if I stumble across some unmoderated creepy stuff when I’m browsing new, I can just close it and move on without the burden of knowing I saw a real thing that happened to a real person.

This is why I stick to hentai. No traficking or coercion or questionable consent there, just a bunch of nerds doing what they love.

I knew it. I felt it the second I typed it that there was something wrong with the analogy and someone who knows birds more than me would come along and point it out. I posted the analogy anyway. That’s on me.

you have to specify what genders of nonbinary are/aren’t welcome

“Genders of nonbinary”

My friend, nonbinary is a gender. This is like asking what type of bird a chicken is.

Harley and Ivey don’t deserve this!

We’re talking about AI porn in this thread. I’m not sure why you’re going off on a rant about exhibitionism, or why you’re doing it here in a reply to my comment.

This is a strange question. What do you think sexuality is? And what about your definition precludes fulfillment from an AI partner?

See? This is what I mean.

Yeah, but with the caveat that this will only make the world a better place if society chose to implicitly allow this, and actively chose not to disparage, mock, and exclude those people who want to go this path. Which, based on everything we’ve ever seen about society, is not going to happen.

both a wife and boyfriend

But where is the conflicting detail?

It’s just very hard to find a compromise or “agree to disagree” when the topic of debate is something like should LGBT people be allowed to exist. The days are long past where the right/left divide was all about economic policy – the divide lies along basic human values at this point. You’re going to be hard pressed to find people who can engage with you calmly when you’re defending a party whose primary concerns right now are stripping away civil rights from their least favorite human beings before all else.

It depends on the distance, or how it was expressed. Less than 12 hours, or exact times, probably means just the actual driving time before any stops. Really long spans of time, or when someone says something fuzzy like “a half-day drive,” you can probably assume are accounting for a break or two.

To answer your specific question, if someone said “a 10 hour drive” to me, I would assume they meant 10 actual road hours, before breaks. I would anticipate their actual arrival in an 11 to 12 hour time frame.