• 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • ewe@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldSteam Deck OLED announced
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s smart. Also, developers have a solid benchmark to set their games to. Console has long had the benefit of a stable hardware set over the course of many years, which makes it easier to develop to the broadest possible market. Skipping incremental APU updates has a benefit of keeping a longer benchmark for game developers hoping to boost sales by targeting the market with handhelds. Valve was pretty clear in their communication in this regard, which is great.







  • ewe@lemmy.worldtoNews@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yep. This is a huge burden on the poorest in our society and basically means the poorest will never be able to afford bond and the richest will always be able to afford bond. At both ends of the spectrum, bond is basically meaningless. If someone is sufficiently rich, if they want to run, they will, regardless of if $200k is forfeit. If someone is sufficiently poor, they’ll never be able to afford to be out of jail, even if they have no intention on running. I’m not saying that Trump is, in fact, a flight risk, but bond is stupid and if someone should be in jail, then they should be in jail or if they should not be in jail, then they should not be in jail. I know it’s an imperfect system living in an imperfect world, but can someone please come up with some sort of technology mechanism so that the current bond system is rendered obsolete, please?

    I feel like the answer is making jail/prison less of a fucking tortuous experience (ala the Scandinavian model), but some people seem to think that jail/prison being the worst possible place to be is a feature, not a bug. If jail were less torturous, then it would be conceivable for rich people who deserve jail to have to go there while awaiting trial and the bond system could be done away with…but that would mean making it nicer for everyone, so probably won’t happen.


  • ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠟⠛⢉⣉⡀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⠘⠛⠋⣉⣁⣤⣤⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠛⠋⠉⠁⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⠘⠛⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀    ⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇                  ⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀    ⠀⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀    ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀   ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿ ⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢈⣉⣉⣉⡁(ceo)⢈⣉⣉⣉ ⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
    ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⣤⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⠀
    










  • Considering giving to any church 501©(3) themselves are considered “charitable donations” when it comes to taxes, this rings a little hollow. If you consider a church as a charity itself, and those churches are soliciting donations every week in services, of course you’re going to see higher charitable giving from areas with a lot of churches/religious. That said, my gripe is not with religious based charities, it’s with churches. Salvation Army can continue to do what it does, religious affiliated childrens hospitals, etc. The amount of money that is spent on congregations is just a waste and it’s a shame.

    ~signed, an atheist (ex)reddit cool guy



  • The news that has come out about how Tesla and Space-X have succeeded in spite of Musk, not because of him, has been eye opening. I think there’s something to be said for having a front man to be the face of a company. Since Apple has been fine post Steve Jobs, so would Tesla and Space-X be fine post Elon. Frankly I’m kind of terrified that Space-X will get dragged down by this shit too, but it seems to have benefitted from being a side-project and not on Elon’s front radar. If Elon gets bored of Twitter and starts doing Space-X stuff again. Thank goodness NASA kept redundancy in their rocket pipelines… At the time, it seemed like a waste, but now it looks very prudent.