Funny because of the “not a paywall” on the article which the intent is to force the user into providing their email address to read the entire article.

Double the resources and free power!

Invalid password, maximum 13 characters.

Same here. I’ve got a handful of friends that only want to talk about the latest call of duty or rainbow six, but I’m just not into the competitive gameplay. I just want to play the game. Single player is the way I go and I play it because it’s like an immersive movie. I get to control the character and see the story unfold, it’s like magic. Every now and then I get to talk about how amazing the story in that one game was, and it’s just like talking about a movie, but I don’t play the single player games solely for the purpose of being able to talk about it. I got to experience it, and play it the way I wanted.

Do you have some tidbits to share on who is being naughty? I’m curious.

Who is a 9 year old article?

What if I just sat in the drive through and said I’m not moving until the prices drop below surge?

Dafuq?

The website is down #1: sales guy vs web dude

Oh I agree. It gets more difficult over time though, as more people begin to only know the entity by the new name. I’m not a Twitter user so I really don’t care about the new “X” name, but I still know and will forever know that Spectrum is Comcast and Lumen is Century Link, because I care deeply about the bullshit they are about. And will I continue to remember Twitter for what it is no matter the name they decide to go by. I was mainly pointing out that they do in fact have the right in the law to rebrand, to put a thin veil over their previous mishaps.

Except they do, and they do it all the time.

• Comcast / Spectrum
• Century Link / Lumen

Just two glaring examples. There’s tons more out there.