I feel like things keep getting worse and worse for Haiti

Oh-neh

Twah

Three is fine

Fah-oor

Feevey

I saw this comment in my notifications and I thought that it was responding to another post about a literal Nazi flag flying 😬

Is America great again yet?

What blogger are you talking about?

This is printed in an exceptionally well regarded and award-winning newspaper by a journalist with a master’s in investigative journalism from Columbia University.

Edit: You’ve now made clear that your only agenda is to discredit a story that makes you uncomfortable. You are willing to embarass yourself to do so, but I have no interest in indulging you.

No one is claiming that’s the problem. You were taking the quote out of context. The context is the entire point:

[A] lesson covering the U.S. Civil War focuses heavily on Robert E. Lee’s “excellent abilities” as general of the Confederate Army… [However,] does not teach that Lee enslaved people or highlight his racist views that Black people were neither intelligent nor qualified to hold political power.

There are different standards in different fields of knowledge. Medical science is different than journalism, which is different from history, which is different from public safety.

In general, a given field has sources that publish information with the highest standard of credibility. In many fields, these are peer-reviewed journals. They may be published by large universities (Harvard Law Review, Oxford Review of Economic Policy), by government bodies (e.g. Smithsonian Magazine, NIHR), by professional organizations (eg. JAMA, Annals of Internal Medicine), or operate independently (e.g. The Lancet, Nature).

It’s pretty clear from the article, as well as the excerpt above. The curriculum is teaching about a history that is closely intertwined with slavery while avoiding mention of slavery. No one is contending the military expertise of Lee; teaching about his life and political legacy while expunging his racist motives is dishonest.

You’ve either completely missed the point or are running for a Texas GOP seat. Maybe both.

List of countries that “England created,” according to givesomefucks:

• Afghanistan
• Australia
• Bahrain
• Belize
• Botswana
• Canada
• Cyprus
• Egypt
• Ghana
• India
• Iraq
• Ireland
• Israel
• Jordan
• Kenya
• Kuwait
• Libya
• Myanmar
• Nigeria
• New Zealand
• Pakistan
• Palestine
• Qatar
• Sudan
• UAE
• USA
• Zambia
• Zimbabwe
• Probably others

“You can’t prove it DOESN’T work.”

“Yes we can. There are literally thousands of studies proving exactly that.”

It does appear to be the case. This article is peppered excessively with antisemitic dog whistles. One or two could be a coincidence but this is something else entirely.

• “Cabal”
• “billionaire class”
• “Santa Claus” (depicting a literal war on Christmas)
• “imaginary surge in “campus antisemitism.””

The entire premise of the article is that evil Zionists sabotaged the American left and manipulated the election, which is itself an antisemitic trope.

The whole point of using dog whistles is to create a sort of plausible deniability. I’m sorry, but in this case it seems like they slipped one by you.

At least your country is down with the clown.

Oh, I thought you meant just repeat the same day that just happened. I did not understand the question.

I could finally ride every ride at Disneyland.

Wasn’t it proven that the poor guy was convicted on bad science? Didn’t the original judge and prosecutor say he should go free?

I hate this stupid state

Cross-post to “DadJokes?”

Imagine explaining this headline into somebody in 1990.

“Allergy butter” is my new name for Jif. Thanks.