Assuming good faith, that’s a hell of an assumption

Many good ones were already mentioned

But from memory:

• The snatch
• The big Lebowsky
• Clerks
• American Psycho
• 2001 a space odissey
• Blade Runner (possibly the directors cut)
• Apocalypse now (possibly the redux version)
• Full metal jacket
• The godfather (first 2 movies, the rest is not as good)
• Fight club
• Alien
• The Truman show
• In the mouth of madness
• They live
• The terminator (first 2)
• Animal house
• the dollar trilogy from Sergio Leone
• Once upon a time in America
• pulp fiction
• reservoir dogs

Very useful rules, I see… impossible to bypass :-)

Quite unusual, was it pure? As far as I know they always mix it with other nasty stuff beig it an excellent polar solvent

Interesting, you just replaced losers and clueless in the gervaise principle

https://thepowermoves.com/the-gervais-principle-summary-review/

Why not rich assholes? Is actually fitting to a very large majority

Or rich psychopaths

Alleluja, you have seen the light

This is right. This requires a discussion a bit wider than 420 letters, even more when they come from Rowling

Km is 10³m cm is 10^-2m so the difference is 10⁵ i.e. 100000 (one with 5 zeroes)

Or more intuitively one centi-meter is a 1/100 of a meter and Kilo-Meter is 1000 meter therefore 100*1000 100000

It is quite intuitive, once you start using it

What’s weird is why we don’t use Megameters and megagrams (i.e. one metric ton)

If only there was a solution, I don’t know, a cable resistent to jamming the ether, something we could call ether-jamming-resistant-network, in short Ethernet

I know… I am just dreaming :-P

Funghi

This man codes

Sorry, but you are wrong, battery means exactly chemical battery

Gravity electrical storage is not a battery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_battery?wprov=sfla1

The taxes should be an exponential function of the income, no tax brackets

I never understood why it isn’t like that

At least a quadratic or cubic function

But that’s about the local temperature of the year, it says nothing about the glaciers shrinking or expanding, also if glaciers are shrinking, wouldn’t we lose some readings? I mean if the glacier this year is smaller than last year, means that we have lost at least one year readings (most likely much more than that), not to mention that it contradicts that ice gets deposited every year.

It is my understanding that glaciers expand and shrink seasonally every year, and lately the expansion (if any) is always smaller than the shrinking, but it is a trend that started more than 100y ago (basically since when we started keeping record) and has been accellerating, because of this how can you extrapolate when to start dating in reverse? If you never saw a the, let’s call it inflationary phase, how do you know when it reversed? The error might be small… or not

Is there an error in my reasoning (or my assumptions)? Consider that I am not the only one having this doubts.

anyhow do you know the answer? Because I’d have a ton of questions, since the argument is complex and I don’t like the hand-wavy argument “well he expert say so”

Experts, scientists, luminaries in their field were prescribing lobotomies to mentally ills and castrations to gay people less than 100 years ago, so yes please always listen to the experts, but keep doubting their answers

All climatologist on this thread, please raise your hand

If you see the number of down votes, for pointing out something that is worth keeping into account, I’d say that is what is “not allowing”

I concede that maybe it’s just my impression

Removed by mod

Well reread what I wrote and what you wrote, I think it’s pretty obvious

From saying “if it was shrinking before it might not be related too human activities” you went full “how are you alive in 2024…” And answered as if I was denying the god revealed truth

That’s a Taliban mentality at work, you don’t discuss the truth

If you can’t see it, I can’t show it to you

BTW do you have the power to ban me? If you don’t then, what are you discussing about silencing and banning?