You called them a transphobe when all they wrote was “I’m not supporting LRG after what they did to that community manager”. No room for discussion huh? Your whole reply was “they are transphobe, just trust me bro. so is OP.”

They defended their position by bringing up some of the things people have a problem with that they think are fine, like being excited about the Harry Potter game and following a couple of conservative accounts. No transphobia so far. What about the 7 year old tweet that someone who doesn’t like the Harry Potter franchise dredged up? If they had that opinion 7 years ago, they might have it today. Does it make you a transphobe if you don’t believe the person should have been fired for this? It’s not the same as agreeing with the tweet.

Is it something you’re willing to discuss here, or is anyone who disagrees with your yet to be revealed argument “terrible” and “transphobic”? Attempting to antagonise and belittle anyone who doesn’t share your view is reddit behaviour. It certainly won’t get anyone on your side who didn’t already agree with you, so I guess you want to make them feel bad, or it makes you feel good?

I hadn’t heard about this. It seems that either OP and you think different things happened, or have differing views on what constitutes transphobia.

The difference is OP actually gave examples to back their claim up and didn’t personally attack anyone. You could be right and maybe you want people like me to blindly trust you, but the way you make your point makes me assume you’re a bad source and full of shit.

I ended up doing my own research and I’d recommend others do the same. Think we have the same views but you’re being aggressive and trying to argue with everyone. I find it ironic that you’re telling people to post on Reddit instead.