If it didn’t risk spreading disease to everyone else, I would totally be on board with letting science deniers drink more raw milk

Lets you turn it off for good…until Google removes that feature

Sounds like a bad thing tbh.

It’ll heat the planet up a lot more too if it scales up

Soma, Stasis (and the other games in the series), Observer, Observation

I usually only block communities, like NoStupidQuestions. There are actually quite a few stupid questions that can be asked, it turns out.

The only other instances I’ve blocked are HilariousChaos for all the spammy/unfunny communities they make and most of the foreign language instances.

In my opinion, yes. If it has telltale signs of being AI generated, it’s garbage.

I think the window for the testing is what matters more. Whatever they do off-season is their business, as long as its not in their system during training and competition

I guess they did bother to create something, although with minimum effort. It comes across as insincere most of the time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge’s_law_of_headlines

No.

Now ppl just need to jam the controller/video frequencies it uses to counter it.

Disclaimer: don’t do this unless you want the FCC knocking on your door too

Looks like a new CVE dropped lol

Interesting experiment, but I’d rather have a personal machine that isnt completely useless when/if the internet goes out. Also would be nice not to depend on a centralized service that could easily revoke access.

Seems like it’s better suited for company work computers.

Yup. I need to remember to block that whole domain next time it pops up in my feed.

The data protection laws are good, but a lot of the other bills for banning dark patterns and other annoying “features” sound difficult to enforce

It’s more of a hivemind mentality that I see sometimes, but reddit is about the same or worse in that respect.

Let’s hope nobody gets left on read

That’s true, but no way for us to know that these companies aren’t storing queries in plaintext on their end (although they would run out of space pretty fast if they did that)

I think they mean that a lot of careless people will give the AIs personally identifiable information or other sensitive information. Privacy and security are often breached due to human error, one way or another.

Apparently the warrant was served only after an discovering evidence from an unrelated (or semi-related?) arrest? The article didn’t specify if his ransomware worked, but I doubt it did if it was mostly GPT-generated. I guess the intention and confession is enough to make charges stick though. Wouldn’t be surprised if whatever GPT service he used also flagged him as suspicious and led authorities to him.