• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    To be fair, she could do that put people would still fixate on the private flight usage.

    No, obfuscating her travel in charters is the viable ‘solution’ to this problem. Still roughly equivalent environmental impact (actually, potentially a bit more since a charter company might have to do extra empty flights for repositioning), but her travel would be harder to discern.

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, she could do that put people would still fixate on the private flight usage.

      Some sure would. But with good PR she could definitely come up on top of it. Certainly better than she fares now. And if someone could pull it off, then it’s her.

      No, obfuscating her travel in charters is the viable ‘solution’ to this problem. Still roughly equivalent environmental impact (actually, potentially a bit more since a charter company might have to do extra empty flights for repositioning), but her travel would be harder to discern.

      That would be the “rich way” to avoid such a problem yeah. But it certainly wouldn’t make her a better person.