The agreement between the pastor of Dad’s Place and the city of Bryan comes with conditions.

  • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It also wasn’t safe for those homeless people to be sleeping outside in frigid temperatures. When weighing the options, would you rather have them sleep in a heated area that allegedly isn’t safe (though perfectly safe for congregants to congregate during normal hours) or sleep outside where they’ll most likely freeze to death? I don’t thinking people would have such an issue if there were a legitimate alternative available but there wasn’t.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s a big difference between sleeping in a place overnight and just standing around “congregating” there, from a fire safety standpoint.

      This is not a one-off issue. The place has been repeatedly failing fire inspections. If the guy wants to use it as a homeless shelter then he needs to fix those issues.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Nobody is arguing that the building should remain unsafe. We’re pointing out that the alternative for those who stayed there would likely have been freezing to death sleeping outside. The place didn’t burn down obviously, so it was definitely the right call to have them sleep in the church during the cold snap.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          They lucked out this time. That’s a lousy basis on which to judge building codes. Every building that burned down and killed dozens in the process spent many days not burning down first.