• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The argument doesn’t sound as convincing this way:

    A Smith and Wesson puts the daintiest of assailants on an equal field with the burliest of women.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      that is not a resonable test in this situation.

      Dont use ‘woman’ as an adjective. No need. Just use dainty/frail vs. burly.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Okay, but they did. I see how it sounds sexist, but how is it actually sexist? Dainty women do exist, and are on average, more dainty than dainty men.