Shell Is Immediately Closing All Of Its California Hydrogen Stations | The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can’t make its operations work here.::The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can’t make its operations work here. All seven of its California stations will close immediately.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    What, you don’t see how great it is to have two separate sets of infrastructure with little overlap in order to have a less efficient solution pushed by the oil industry?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s it of course isn’t it the hydrogen is generated through fracking so they’re just trying to maintain the existing business model.

      That alone is the reason that no one should have ever paid attention to it. It wasn’t ever intended to actually work it was supposed to just look like it might work so that they would continue to get some money.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. There was a time, 10 or 20 years ago, where I would have said we should invest into all possible solutions, including batteries and hydrogen. It would have been nice to have it all be funded 10 times more than they were, but they were funded.

        And then batteries won. The pseudo-reasonable argument “we should fund every possible avenue” no longer applies. We did that, and now is the time to go all in on the winner.

        • buzziebee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The materials to make batteries aren’t readily available in the quantities needed to add grid scale storage to all countries and replace all global ICE vehicles. Hydrogen is also ideal for countries like Japan where their grid isn’t all connected (it’s loads of small grids) and can’t handle either the increased load from charging vehicles, or transport the energy from productive renewables areas to non productive renewables areas.

          Like with most energy tech, we should be investing in it all so we have a diverse mix of solutions.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            The materials to make batteries aren’t readily available in the quantities needed to add grid scale storage

            Let me stop you right there. The batteries for grid scale are not going to be lithium, which I’m guessing is what you’re thinking.

            Like with most energy tech, we should be investing in it all so we have a diverse mix of solutions.

            We did. Batteries won and hydrogen lost. Now is the time to deploy what we have.

            • RedFox@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              There’s also upcoming solid state batteries, and maybe flow batteries if they can get the electrolyte mixture efficient.

              I am very intrigued by flow batteries. It basically behaves like a gas fuel concept. Pump some out, pump some in, charge it slowly somewhere else,. hopefully from solar and wind, or fusion haha

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Flow batteries currently don’t have the kwh per kg to be competitive in EVs, but they’re great for grid storage. There are some lab advancements improving that of late, but as with all battery tech lab advancements, you shouldn’t rely on any one of them working out to mass production.

                • RedFox@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  True, and a bummer at the moment.

                  I’m hoping there’s a future efficiency gain. Like how we transitioned from nicad, to li, and now to solid?

                  The concept is super cool.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Hydrogen is simply less efficient. Switching to it would increase total load on the grid, even if you try to distribute production then the losses takes away available energy for other uses. At some point it becomes cheaper to invest to connect the grid together.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I am not familiar with it, would you mind telling me how much works? Why would Hydrogen not be sourced from ocean water and then compressed/stored? How did fracking come in, it seems like a chore to have made it so

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          It can be through electrolysis, but it is almost never done that way. It’s less efficient than simply using the grid to charge batteries, in that usecase the ONLY benefit it has its energy density (and that might not last either).

          In practice the main source is as a byproduct from refining fossil fuel like oil or gas which is separated and collected.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because electrolysis requires ungodly amounts of electricity in order to work on industrial scales in theory it’s doable but no one does it. We would practically have to crack nuclear fusion to make it viable, which sort of defeats the point.

          However you can get it from shale gas quite easily because it’s just in there mixed in with the gas, I assume some geological process creates it, so you just need to separate it from the gas. The trouble is it involves doing the actual fracking, even if you don’t actually ever burn the gas, which they also do because of course they do.

          It’s just a totally stupid system all around.