• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    These kinds of comments frustrate me… They fundamentally conflate the presidency with a more king-like position.

    The system is setup against him doing anything other than speaking out about the issue and trying to motivate others to do something about it. The president ultimately has little power … it’s more of a oversight/cheer leading position (with some extended powers over the years to deal with imminent issues – e.g., authorize short term military operations, which is still scary in the wrong hands) while congress is the office workers that are supposed to actually get the law writing done.

    Unfortunately, we’ve had roughly a decade of Republican lead stagnation due to slim majority Democrat representation or outright majority Republican representation – the Republican platform is after all the “do nothing because more government is bad” platform.

    He’s doing exactly what he should be doing, using the office to call people out and bring attention to issues/start conversations. That can result in brands either going “… lets make a voluntary change to get the heat off” or the public going “yeah that’s a good point calls congressional rep to complain.”

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well put!

      The president ultimately has little power … it’s more of a oversight/cheer leading position

      And let me emphasize this is a good thing, even if the previous officeholder ignored legal restrictions on his power