• Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They need to get past the Senate filibuster.

        But the real problem is a Commander in Chief who doesn’t want to fulfill treaty obligations. Congress doesn’t have a mechanism to force that, just impeachment which we’ve seen fail already. So while we can’t officially leave, we aren’t going to be participating under him either.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Implying checks and balances will apply to “only 1 day” dictator Don.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sure, with Kaine’s and Rubio’s bill from December, it now requires Senate approval. But all Trump really needs to do is to say that the US won’t help its allies, which is what he’s doing. And since NATO is based on deterrence, he’s effective undermining trust in NATO as an alliance. The winners are Russia and China.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      So what happens if he just says not to go help NATO if article 5 is invoked (if that’s the one where a member is attacked)? Doing nothing seems more up his alley anyways, pulling out requires more work so he’ll probably just say no if it’s needed.

      I got no idea if the US armed forces can deploy without the president’s approval in some way or if Trump says no go then it’s completely off. Been wondering as a NATO neighbor who’s country he called a security threat his first term.