• Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would guess the argument is that the enforcement reduces the number of jumpers. So despite them running a negative on cost to catch. If the enforcement wasn’t there the number of jumpers would be high enough to justify the cost of enforcement. Having said that I don’t know if that is a knowable number.

    • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They are spending 150million that is 1442x what they are losing, even if their enforcement is reducing the number of fare jumpers it would take basically everyone jumping the line to make up the difference.

      They’d save money just by eating the cost…

      I cannot see how this ever economically works out.

      Got some more numbers, this meme (surprise) isn’t telling the whole story. I’m still not saying it works out, but it’s not this simple.

      Okay so the MTA has a budget of 19billion, of which $6.870 billion comes from fares, in 2022 they lost $285million in subway fares, and the police caught 105,000 people in 2023.

      I cannot find where the $104k number is coming from, I assume that’s the total amount owed by those they caught, but if they caught 105k people that’s only a dollar a person so I don’t know if it’s that low or I’m misunderstanding the $104k number.

      Again not saying it works out, but I’m not smart enough to do that math…

      • zerog_bandit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe this is the original problem. Why the fuck am I trusting some rando ruzzia twitter bot with facts and figures when the truth is published?

        Lol.