• Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Gun control only really became a thing once Black people started arming themselves.

    Negative. Gun Control in the United States predates the founding of the country and it was both racist and classist from the very outset. As documented in that link Gun Control laws have been around for over 200 years and were instituted against Blacks but also against the Irish, the Chinese, and Native Americans.

    Your comment is based on The Mulford Act, a stupid and racist piece of California legislation passed with bi-partisan effort and signed by then Governor Ronald Reagan in response to publicly armed Black Panthers. It wasn’t even close the first serious gun control law to get passed.

    For instance Mulford was modeled on The Sullivan Act enacted by New York State in 1911. It intentionally targeted Italian immigrants, another distinct minority at the time.

    This country has ALWAYS enacted Gun Control in response to racial and class elements.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, fair, my bad. You’re right.

      Also holy shit, why would any reasonable person support stupid shit like gun control in that light?

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also holy shit, why would any reasonable person support stupid shit like gun control in that light?

        In yesterday’s society it was to protect the wealth and position of the Upper and Middle classes. In today’s society it’s because it seems like an obvious response to things like Mass Shootings and Gun Crime. The hidden in plain sight truth though is that modern day Gun Control proposals are doing the same thing as yesterday’s Gun Control proposals because if you have enough money they will not apply to you.

        Pass a new Federal Assault Weapons Ban? No problem for the wealthy, they’ll just drop $20,000 on a pre-ban machine gun that can be legally transferred to them. Pass a Federal “Red Flag” law? They don’t care as they know it’ll never be enforced against them; their connections, money, and lawyers will see to it. Federal UBC? Again, no worries as their connections, money, and lawyers all make sure they won’t be impacted. Remove the 2nd Amendment and ban the private ownership of firearms? No worries, the bodyguards surrounding them and their families will still be armed, just like they are everywhere else in the world.

        No direct causal link between the number of guns in circulation and the amount of “Gun Crime”, however you define that, has ever been shown. The household ownership rate has been bouncing around the low to mid 40s since 1972.. The population of the US grew from 240M in 1972 to 322M in 2014 too, so that 40% household ownership rate includes an addition 80 Million people.

        The number of NICS (Federal Background Checks) in the United States has quadrupled from 10 Million per year to 40 Million per year between 1998 and 2020.

        Meanwhile Violent Crime of all types fell from it’s high of 9.82 in 1991 to 4.4 in 2014, a decrease of 50%. Gun Crime specifically peaked in 1993 and then declined by 49% over the next 20 years.

        In short the US added a SHIT ton of guns starting in the 90s and tens of millions of new owners were added as our population grew…all while both Violent and Gun Crime continued to drop. We have a problem for sure, but it ain’t the guns.