0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agorulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1725arrow-down10
arrow-up1725arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.ml0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoI mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up21·1 year agoThe original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since. 1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since.
1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
They should have put the /s