• NotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    To be fair (and you can probably see by my username I don’t like reddit anymore), I think it makes perfect sense to dispose of a fair portion of your shares in this situation. Firstly, these asshats get paid part of their salary in shares, it’s natural to want to get more security on part of your income. Secondly, with how hard the price rose in the first couple of days, it makes sense. But people are welcome to disagree, of course.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      How does that respond to the original idea, that is:

      if they believed in the company, they would hold their stock.

      You are not a genius for selling your company’s stock after IPO, you are a grifter. Doesn’t matter how many voting shares they have, doesn’t matter how much more money they need - they do get paid in cash too, and they can borrow against the stock.

      So they sold out. Fuck them both for that.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        if they believed in the company, they would hold their stock.

        The COO holds 1.4 million now, so she dumped 25% of her shares

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Selling quarter of your stock AT THE FUCKING IPO is a shame. I can’t believe people are defending that.

          And I suspect they can’t sell the rest as easily as the A shares.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              And how does that go against the “they don’t have faith in their business” argument?

              • dmrzl@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Imagine talking about faith in that situation. If you really think faith is a good base for financial decisions you better keep far away from the stock market.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I have nothing I’m willing to defend about Reddit management, I love the idea that they will end up penniless one day (though I’m sure that will not happen.)

            I just don’t think selling off 25% of one’s shares (necessarily) means what has been suggested.

              • howrar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Selling everything = I have no faith

                Keeping everything when these shares represent almost your entire net worth = I know with 100% certainty that this business will grow

                Selling off 25% = I believe in the company, but I also acknowledge that there are many variables outside of my control that can affect the success of this company and I don’t want those to have huge negative repercussions on my life.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The point would be to diversify assets. You don’t want to gamble everything on the hope the thing you believe in is successful. Not that I think they believe in the platform, but it is probably a smart idea to diversify no matter what. 25% of your shares does seem like a lot though.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          If they sold at $50 a share, they pocketed over $25M each. Even after taxes, that is more than enough to live comfortably in any region’s cost of living.

          That’s not diversifying. That is greed.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Them not selling isn’t any more greedy. No matter what, they own the value of the stocks, whether they liquidate them or not. It’s fucked up that anyone gets paid that amount in general, but they did and it’s theirs. I don’t know what you people would want from them. Isn’t holding onto the shares hoping the value goes up even more greedy?

          • rezifon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Or you sell stock when you need to rebalance. Fuck spez, but selling 25% at IPO seems sane and reasonable to me.