• pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Microplastics and plastic related byproducts, like phtalates (which are connected with a decreased fertility in mammals)
    I’m positive that the long term effects of these substances, that can be found in every link of the food chain nowadays, will be discussed a lot in the future

    • keenanpepper@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This may be true but I hate the practice of referring to “plastic” as if it’s a single substance. It’s a bunch of different materials that don’t really have that much in common with each other, especially from a health/toxicity standpoint.

      For example, people treat it as common sense that “you shouldn’t burn plastic” because the smoke is “toxic”. For PVC this is totally true, it makes very nasty stuff like dioxin that will poison you. But on the other hand you can burn polyethylene (think milk jug) and it’s no more toxic than burning a candle. Definitely way healthier to breath than wood campfire smoke, for example.

      There’s also such a silly pattern where people learn some chemical might have some effect on the body and suddenly everyone is up in arms about it. For example Bisphenol A in many applications was replaced by the very similar Bisphenol S just so things could be labeled “BPA Free”. BPS probably has similar estrogenic effects to BPA.

      I’d say the moral of the story is be wary of received wisdom about chemical toxicity from people who aren’t chemists.

      • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not only BPAs but many chemicals like BPAs can cause birth defects because our bodies think they are estrogen.

        If this worries you, read the books It Starts With the Egg and Grain Brain.

        They both suggest that not only what you eat, but how it’s prepared can affect the health of a child.

        For instance it’s a big no-no, according to It Starts With the Egg, to heat most plastics in the microwave. The heat breaks the plastic down, it can get in your blood, your body will think it’s estrogen, and they don’t even know the full effects of this yet.

        So think about

        • burritos in plastic wrapping,
        • cling wrap on a bowl,
        • reheating leftovers in Tupperware,
        • disposable cutlery

        These chemicals are not just in food:

        • your car’s interior
        • your cell phone case
        • even the clothes on your back, unless they’re 100% pure, untreated, natural fabric, may have been made with these chemicals.
      • sadbehr@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you heard of Dihydrogen monoxide? It literally kills hundreds of thousands of people every single year all over the world, including young children.

        You don’t hear about it in the news though do you…

          • piece@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s an old (early-internet?) joke iirc. And yes, I think that’s the answer

            • islandofcaucasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh shit, I was thinking there was no way that hundreds of thousands of people did from drowning every year, but they actually do.

              WHO estimates that every year over 200k people die from drowning

              • sadbehr@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yea I did my 10 seconds of research before I quoted my number! I could have said ‘200k’ but ‘hundreds of thousands’ sounds much more dramatic don’t you think? Which is the whole point of the Dihydrogen monoxide thing.

      • radix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are microplastics similarly diverse in their effects on the human body?

  • Mert@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microplastics and PFAS

    No, seriously, these two will kill Earth, and us

  • lynny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Social media. It wasn’t until very recently that people started to realize just how harmful it actually is.

    • manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Less social media IMO, more the weaponization of techniques first researched in the 60s-80s made real and pushed via automaton to all corners of the public internet.

      The reason you become vulnerable is because you abdicate control (most had no idea) of your feed to providers that own domain names.

      This was a co-option of how the internet worked previously.

      • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What kind of techniques were researched? This sounds interesting to learn about. Do you have some terms I could search that will help me learn more?

          • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I always thought the Cambridge Analytical scandal was just the left trying to point fingers at how Trump could have possibly won, instead of blaming the Democratic party for their terrible handling of the Sanders campaign, and how Clinton was so utterly unlikable, they grasped at so many straws, we’re still reeling from it to this day.

            The big ones being the Ukrainian war, the failure of the Afghanistan pull-out, and of course CA.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well this might come as a shock but the techniques used to groom suicide bombers also work on white people too. Prey on their disillusionment, pump them full of hatred for “the enemy” then give them the means to carry out an attack.

          But if you’re digging back through history, check out how once upon a time, everyone from the US government to Coca-Cola was awkwardly trying their hand at mind control.

          Fortunately, they’ve pinky promised that’s all behind them now, despite having access to millions of people who voluntarily pin their own eyes open and spend the night scrolling through rapid flashes of sex, violence and extremism, in their own DIY Clockwork Orange therapy (only it’s trying to make them worse, not better)

          What could go wrong except for everything that’s currently going wrong?

          The damage done by giving neoliberals power and the far-right platform is going to take decades to undo, if we survive it at all.

          Climate change is progressing at an alarming rate while the oil and gas lobby teach AI how to astroturf, cheered on by every billionaire hoping they can fire their employees and pocket their wages.

          If the far-right are given the power they need, they’ll decimate the population searching for whatever magic group they need to genocide that will make their parents love them, their mental illness evaporate and their dicks 14" long. When they finally realize no such group exists, we’ll get to see what happens when you give the nuclear launch codes to wife beaters ane school shooters.

          Vote better.

    • speaker_hat@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, and I think it’s even more broader: Anxiety and stress. These are extremely dangerous and underrated, and even exploited by many (e.g. news, politicians, workplace, social media, marketing). It’s like sticking a cigarette into your mouth without you able to immediately take it out.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sugar is not bad. Abuse of sugar is bad. Sugar is absolutely fine, as long as one doesn’t exceed. Problem is that in American-inspired diets sugar is everywhere at gigantic doses

      • speaker_hat@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do basic groceries abuse sugar? And I’m not talking about the “organic” ones

        • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Depends on what you mean by “basic groceries.” Produce and generally anything that is not processed or prepackaged is ok, but most anything ready to eat, including any baked goods is likely to be pretty high in sugar.

          And just FYI, since glucose, fructose, and sucrose are all naturally occurring, they (and HFCS) are considered organic legally

      • Nioxic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sugar does nothing good and its 100% konessential for the human body. You dont need to eat a single carb.

        And that includes fiber, which is also a carb.

        • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Good luck with your digestion if you don’t eat fibers… Your gut flora must live a miserable life :(

      • UhBell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fructose is typically fine when it’s paired with equal amounts of glucose, like in fruit. Your body has a really hard time processing high concentrations of fructose alone, which is how most sugary food is produced now a days since high fructose is a much cheaper method of sweetening food than a balanced mix of sugars.

        • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Except “high fructose corn syrup” doesn’t really have that high of a concentration of fructose. Standard corn syrup and most fruits have glucose and fructose in a ratio that’s roughly 50:50. HFCS is about 55:45 in favor of fructose, mostly because both sugars are roughly the same stability from a chemical sense, so the enzyme that is used to convert one to the other (glucofructoisomerase, IIRC) can’t really get that far from that 50:50 ratio. There are lots of natural sources that are way higher in fructose (agave nectar is like 90:10 fructose, again IIRC).

          And fructose isn’t added to everything because the sugar is cheaper than other sugars (although the government subsidies for corn farmers do make HFCS ridiculously cheap); it’s because our taste buds perceive fructose as sweeter than a similar amount of other simple sugars. So it’s actually cheaper to use HFCS than raw corn syrup or other sugar sources, because your actually need less sugar to get the same taste. It’s really similar to how artificial sweeteners work; a synthetic molecule can trick our taste buds into sending signals to the brain that say “this is sweet” at a rate that’s 80-300x more effective per molecule. A lot of artificial sweeteners do actually have calories when digested, but such a small amount of sweetener gets used that the caloric content gets rounded down to zero. But I digress.

          The real issue is that simple sugars are being added in large amounts to EVERYTHING (because they taste good), and processed and prepackaged foods are cheaper to buy and easier than preparing food yourself. HFCS ships easily, has a long shelf life, and puts money in the pockets of corporate farms that prefer to grow one (maybe two) crops over vast swathes of land in the US, which is why it’s everywhere. Not that corn is anything special! You can make a high fructose syrup from nearly any starchy crop. Corn was just in the right place at the right time.

          Like with most problems in the US, the real underlying cause is the corporations and government subsidies that ignore sustainability (economic and environmental), as well as the health of the population in favor of profit. Unfortunately, that’s a tougher problem to solve and political and economic reform is a tougher sell for Middle America than making one specific ingredient into a Boogeyman.

          Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

          Edit: cleaned up autocorrect typos and grammar

    • Radio_717@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Soda specifically - is something we should be looking closer at in relation to sugar abuse. The number of kids and young adults I see quaffing giant plastic cups of fountain drinks is alarming.

      Even worse when they use it to replace water.

  • Sharkbreath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism. Been around for all generations but feels like greed is at its worst now.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Probably brake pads. Everyone’s living in cities now, just breathing in brake pad and lead particles.

    Oh and car tires. Just huffing those all day.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This right here. We are undoubtedly the plastic generation. And it’s not letting up any time soon; our kids will be included in this cohort as well. Banning plastic bags in cities is next to useless when everything we eat, everything we drink, and everything we buy is wrapped in plastic.

      • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My country is exceptionally bad about this.

        Buy a plastic package of crackers? It will be filled with smaller packages of crackers all wrapped in plastic with a plastic freshener pack for each one. I am not exaggerating. I am not sure I have ever bought something that didn’t have at least two degrees of plastic wrap.

        We did stop giving plastic bags out at cashiers unless requested, but that means shitall when everything you buy is triple-wrapped to begin with.

      • BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Banning plastic bags I could get behind. It was inconvenient, but necessary. My city just passed an ordinance that all paper bags require a $0.15 charge. As if it wasn’t already $7 for a hamburger, now you get to pay more to keep your fries from spilling all over the car seat.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plastic in general, except that we know and just keep doing it. I’m trying to use less plastic if I can but it’s frickin everywhere. If you want to buy an ear of corn it’s wrapped in plastic as if it isn’t already wrapped in nature’s protection. Seriously people.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This, big time. Pretty much every product or package contains some plastics, including so many one-time use disposable ones. Plastics are infesting the Earth from pole to pole, they are everywhere. Clothes are made of plastic, do laundry and a bunch of microplastics go down the drain. Car tires drop microplastics as they wear. And then there’s all the large ones we can see like plastic bags, bottles, etc.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Perfluoroalkyls aka PFAS appear to screw with all manner of body functions.

    Since you mention tobacco: It’s worth noting that the smoking/cancer connection was noticed long before peak cigarette smoking in the population. Prior to WWII, lung cancer was considered a rare disease. That changed with the mass marketing of cigarettes.

    • WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a couple studies showing that even though your body can’t process and remove PFAS and it just keeps accumulating, if you donate blood regularly you reduce the amount in your body by a bit each time. There are other slight health benefits to donating blood and lots of places will pay you for it. So if you can reduce your PFAS intake and donate blood you can slowly get rid of it. I use arch linux btw.

      • ShadowAether@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Largely by avoiding waterproof or water resistant skincare products such as sunscreen and makeup. Also avoid using nonstick cookware.

      • steal_your_face@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I recently got a reverse osmosis water filter to remove it from my water. Since I rent I got a countertop filter but if you own your place you can get a filter installed for all your water.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That really does seem to be a US thing. From a distance your country does seem to have a very weird corn fetish.

  • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aside from tobacco, all of those things were known to be dangerous but used commercially anyway because they were cheaper than alternatives. Today’s equivalents are PFAS, plastics, and sweeteners of every kind. You will die with all of them in your body.

    • odbol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re finding microplastics everywhere now. Even like inside apples and stuff: the plastic somehow travels up the tree into the fruit

      • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Somehow? This rock, and most everything on it, is almost completely water. Microplastics are in “the water”, therefore they’re in everything.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tiktok.

    You said product, and I mean this legitimately. Not because of meme hate or hating on what is trendy, but because it is and has been a tool of the CCP. This isn’t really in question, and it was one of the first large platforms to entirely erase the idea of a timeline and fully devote itself only to a algorithm feed. One that bytedance has put their finger on the scales of many times.

    The effect this has is hard to quantify, but the postmortem on it is going to be incredible as we unpack exactly how much this influenced the trends and politics among zoomers, and to what extent.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the part that gets me. In China kids are educational content and are blocked during certain times of the day.

    • biddy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they said unknown threat. Everyone knows that TikTok is a tool for CCP spying and propaganda, but somehow most of us don’t care.

      • RaleighEnt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        every social/digital media platform is leveraged for spying and propaganda. if you didn’t want to be spied on you’d throw your whole damn phone away. it’s just the way shit is now. either accept that reality, ignore it, or become a hermit.

        • biddy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Other thing is also bad is not a good argument. You can reduce the amount of spying if you want to.

    • nivenkos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you used TikTok? - it’s the only mainstream platform with freedom of speech and mostly free discussion.

      Reddit was far, far worse with all the bots, shadow-banning, deleted comments, etc.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think using the term “free speech” in this context is correct since free speech doesn’t extend to whether an app or website deletes your comments. Free speech just means the government won’t reprimand you.

        Tiktok definitely takes things down, and I’d say that algorithm has done more harm than good in how fast it radicalizes people.

        • nivenkos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Radicalises” how?

          Just because they disagree with you?

          It’s one of the few free forums, especially that is so large.

          Just look at the Twitter files and Reveddit - they’re far worse if you don’t parrot the line of the US State Department.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But is it sinophobia? It’s no secret that Xi Jinping and the party like to have companies firmly under their thumb. All you have to do is threaten a few execs. Or hell, a good chunk of companies have deference to the party baked into their charter.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is no secret. Maybe have a little skepticism towards your favored country’s claims that any opposition to the government is bigotry towards the people? They use that to maintain control over the population.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh I disagree about the Sinophobia thing, they’re not expressing fear or dislike of Chinese people, they’re criticizing the chinese government.

        Criticizing an authoritarian government =/= racism. People =/= their government.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In comments I’ve seen, the person you’re responding to has always resisted that distinction when it comes to China, though decidedly less so when wishing collapse upon the US. Speaking of the US, apparently our use of color for advertising is literally worse than the Holocaust!

      • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ++1 TikTok is only political because Americans want to own everyone’s data exclusively.

    • Jee@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am pretty sure everyone including those who use it know it’s dangerous. Slightly safer than cigarette yeah sure but no sane person would call it safe.