Justices to consider constitutionality of punishing people for sleeping outside as western states seek to address encampments

A case that could significantly change how US cities respond to the growing homelessness crisis has reached the supreme court as record numbers of people in America find themselves without a permanent place to live.

The justices on Monday will consider a challenge to rulings from a California-based appeals court that found punishing people for sleeping outside when shelter space is lacking amounts to unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment.

The case stems from a 2019 camping ban enacted by city officials in Grants Pass, Oregon, a small mountain town where rents are rising and there is just one overnight shelter for adults. Debra Blake, who had lost her job a decade earlier and was unhoused, was cited for illegal camping. After being convicted and fined, she soon joined other unhoused residents in suing the city over the ordinance.

  • Tebbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Maybe they should invest in proper shelters then if they don’t want them in the parks…

    • tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve read elsewhere that the city already had a case like this, where it was ruled it wasn’t illegal as long as there wasn’t adequate shelter. Or something along those lines.