• just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    deally they’d pass comprehensive privacy protection laws to setup standards that both domestic and foreign companies would be subject to.

    No, no, no. That would mean dismantling PRISM and the FISA. Gathering data on citizens is only bad when China does it.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I mean, to be fair, both are extremely bad and should be stopped, but a hostile foreign country gathering data and pushing propaganda on your citizens IS worse than you or non-hostile foreign countries doing it.

      • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would argue that gathering data about your own citizens is actively worse than china doing it; an average US citizen has a lot more to lose if the 3-letter-agencies or the police use it against them, because those are who you would have to deal with in person.

        • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Valid point. I think the issue is that we know there is no good reason for China to have that data, and we know that they are hostile, so it’s an easy decision.