The Wakayama Prefectural Police revealed on May 8, 2024 that Your Name. movie producer Koichiro Itou has been referred to prosecutors for additional violation of Child Prostitution & Pornography law in Japan, after it came to light that he had paid an underage girl for sexual intercourse.

The latest case involved a 17-year-old high school girl from Yokohama. Investigators believe Itou knew the girl was a minor when he paid her 30,000 yen for having sexual intercourse at his residence in December 2023.

He is also suspected of taking and saving photographs of the act.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, but none of the local governments had it at 13, so this is purely symbolic

    • yukichigai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      If you compare that to the average cost of living in Japan it’s a bit closer to $300 in terms of spending power.

      Either way it’s a lot cheaper than I’d expect to have to pay anyone for sex work, much less something that blatantly illegal.

      Oh, as for the age of consent thing that change just made it a national crime. Every prefecture in Japan had already raised the age of consent to 16 (or higher) well before last year. The only places it didn’t apply were some remote military bases and IIRC the portion of Antarctica that Japan claims. Still a good move but it’s not like Japanese pedos were just having sex with 13-year-olds without consequence before then.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You know 16 is the age of consent for well over half the US states as well right? Not defending people that abuse that fact, but that is a very common age to use as the cutoff point.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              There are Romeo and Juliette laws for things like that, essentially a reasonable age gap.

              • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Yes. However, for everyone that doesn’t understand why the word “reasonable” is important here: When it comes to age differences and sexual relationships, what a “reasonable person thinks” isn’t nearly as important as how a reasonable person might react when laying down a sentence. Sexual misconduct involving the word “Minor”, which immediately brings with it terms like “Coercion”, “Authority”, and the “inability to give consent” tend to receive strong reactions, and strong responses.

                Basically, if you’re 18 and your partner is 17, be extremely cautious to the point of not becoming sexually active together. This includes videos and photos. People’s lives have been ruined for less. I am not in any way advocating for and validating (or dismissing) large age gaps, only providing information for our younger users who may not realize this.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Thank you for the additional details. I figured a 17 and 18 year old would be fine but beyond that it gets questionable IMO.

          • skulblaka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            As I understand it this is in place to prevent having to prosecute teenagers for having consensual sex. Which they’re going to do, illegal or not. But if they were one or both below the age of consent they would legally not be able to consent and this would be considered a rape, easily prosecutable by angry parents.

            It is genuinely good that it is this way.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        that was the national age, just about everywhere had local laws with a higher age already on the books, I think tokyo was 17 or something like that

    • toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      But that makes it…legal, though, if the girl consented to the sex, right? Or is the prostitution part what makes it illegal?