• Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Core Ultra chips, like the Ryzen 7040-series chips, also include a neural processing unit (NPU) that can be used to accelerate some AI workloads. But both NPUs fall far short of the performance required for Recall and other locally accelerated AI features coming to Windows 11 24H2 later this year;

    Why even waste the fucking space on the die then?

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I sure as hell don’t, but it seems extra pointless when it can’t even run the workloads it was designed for.

        • tedu@azorius.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m sure it still works in photoshop or whatever, just not the windows stuff.

    • fif-t@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Because the NPUs were designed and built and included long before Windows 11’s AI features were announced?

      If I recall correctly, it typically takes about 4 years for a CPU to go from design to distribution.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Meteor Lake was taped out in May 2021 and launched in December 2023. Still much slower than the pace of LLM development, to be fair. It seems more like an “if you build it, they will come” approach. But that’s also how we got stuck with (for most consumer purposes) useless tensor cores on our GPUs. Does anyone even give a shit about raytracing/DLSS anymore?

        It actually sounds like Microsoft is betraying Intel for Qualcomm, since their upcoming processor in the new Surface tablet is the only one that actually meets the requirements. So it looks like Microsoft doesn’t give two shits about supporting existing hardware either way.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Tensor cores can be used to play chess, generate images, do realistic text to speech, do noise cancellation, content-aware fill, etc.

          They are only useless to you and other people with no imagination

          • Technus@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Chess engines have outplayed humans for thirty years, and they didn’t need teraflops of computing power to do it.

            Generative AI is actively harmful to the environment, slowing the phase-out of coal in the US and guzzling billions of gallons of water. It’s likely going to kill jobs and it’s already filling the internet and the academic world with garbage. It’s also likely a bubble that will burst before long, potentially bringing the economy down with it.

            I’ll give you noise cancellation and text-to-speech, that’s pretty cool.

            But personally, I’d rather have more CUDA cores.

            • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That middle paragraph is very misleading. It’s Generative AI as a service that is actively harmful to the environment. Having a 15 W chip to do tasks like erasing objects from a photo is not any more harmful to the environment than a GPU that uses 15W. In fact, NPUs can be more efficient at some tasks than GPUs.

              The problem is opening your phone/browser, and being able to call on demand GPT-4 to wake up a cluster of 128 Nvidia A100s operating at around 300-400W each. That’s 51.2 kW.

              Now you can draw some positives and negatives from that figure, such as

              • Given that an iPhone 15 Pro’s A17 has a thermal design power of 8 W, GPT-4 on the server is about 6400 more energy intensive than anything you can do on an iPhone. 10 seconds of GPT need a similar amount of energy to an iPhone 15 Pro operating flat out at maximum power for 18 hours. Now in those 10 seconds, OpenAI says they “handle multiple user queries simultaneously”, but still - we’re feeding the machine.
              • 51.2 kW is also roughly how much power a large SUV needs to roll at constant speed on a motorway. Each of those large clusters uses a similar amount of energy to a single 7-seater SUV, but serving many users at the same time. Plus unlike cars, a large portion of their energy usage comes from renewables. So yes, I agree that it’s a significant impact but largely overrepresented and we have bigger fish to fry; personal transport is a way bigger issue.
            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t need to outplay humans, I need to see the optimal line to analyze it. Chess is still not solved, so Leela Zero is still helpful because it’s giving better advice than older engines. Even Stockfish went neural network, but a smaller one that reads deeper. They still can’t tell us if the game from the start ends in a draw like checkers.

              Killing jobs is good. It’s already freeing people from having to write things like promotional emails. Maybe they are sad they don’t have a job anymore, but unemployment if 4%, hardly difficult to get a different one. It’s not an important job anyway, I wouldn’t feel creative to write about a labor day sale or whatever

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m so curious to see how a Qualcomm gambit plays out for Microsoft.

          With the ethos at Qualcomm being support a chip for 1 year, then move on, I have trouble believing they’ll update the drivers for a major windows release

          Google browbeat them for nearly 10 years, and then ended up going with the majority Samsung designed chip called Tensor just to compete against Apple in years of updates