vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 6 months agoSupreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks’ ban is unlawfulwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up1270arrow-down16
arrow-up1264arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks’ ban is unlawfulwww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square148fedilink
minus-squareJimmyeatsausage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-26 months agoIf ever there was a case for “more guns = more freedom”, right?
minus-squareikidd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·6 months agoTaliban or not, the peasants made it impossible for both Russia and the US to hold for any period of time using a pretty ancient rifle.
minus-squareJimmyeatsausage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·6 months agoI think the IEDs, suicide bombers, and RPGs made a bigger difference in both cases
minus-squareikidd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·6 months agoWell, of course it wasn’t just the rifle. But my point was that low-tech armaments (and terrain to an extent) didn’t make it a walk in the park no matter how high-tech your military. You still have to hold it.
If ever there was a case for “more guns = more freedom”, right?
Taliban or not, the peasants made it impossible for both Russia and the US to hold for any period of time using a pretty ancient rifle.
I think the IEDs, suicide bombers, and RPGs made a bigger difference in both cases
Well, of course it wasn’t just the rifle. But my point was that low-tech armaments (and terrain to an extent) didn’t make it a walk in the park no matter how high-tech your military. You still have to hold it.
deleted by creator