• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Valve has enough of the market that they don’t need to do that because they’re the default option, just like Microsoft doesn’t need to fear macOS or Linux or anyone that would try to jump in the game and create a new OS (hell, they even had up finance Apple in order to create competition). They don’t practice these shady tactics (although that’s disputable and they’re getting sued for it) because they don’t have to to win, they can just wait it out and let potential competitors ruin themselves. Even if someone came and offered everything Steam offers and more, people wouldn’t switch because their games are already on Steam. Just like people who are used to Windows and have bought programs compatible with it won’t abandon everything and start over with another OS.

    • RandomException@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      So “too big to fail” or something?

      I don’t know if you lived through the Internet Explorer era, but that was exactly the same situation in browsers back in the day. Internet Explorer was preinstalled in every Windows computer, so in pretty much every computer, and it was deemed as “unbeatable” because people were too lazy to install anything else. In retrospective, it didn’t take too long for Google Chrome to beat IE market share and nowadays pretty much the whole world uses Chrome and nothing else. Now, with IE, EU had to step in and force Microsoft to present their users a dialog to choose their browser in a fresh Windows installation which did have a role in that market share change. With Steam there isn’t a need for that, because every user has to go and explicitly install Steam client to their computer before using it. Same goes with Chrome.

      Although, vendor lock really is a real issue, and I do agree with you that if one has thousands of euros/dollars worth of games in their Steam account, it’s purely convenient to keep on buying their next games on Steam as well. What I don’t agree with is, that if there was a new competitor that was better in every way imaginable and they were able to sell the games on their platform for, let’s say, -5% constantly, people wouldn’t start using their service. You have to remember, that there is also a constant stream of new gamers (young people) that haven’t even created a Steam account, and nothing is preventing them from choosing another service for their first game purchase. It’s just that there isn’t a real alternative to Steam currently.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know if you lived through the Internet Explorer era

        You know this person didn’t live through that era. They’re waaaay too young for that.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        An alternative that allows you to add friends, instant message them in-game whenever, that also hosts social hubs for each of its thousands of games; where people can post guides, fanart, videos, and discussions?