Wealth and hubris fuel the tale of a politically connected Missouri couple who allegedly poisoned their neighbor’s trees to secure their million-dollar view of Camden Harbor. The incident that was unearthed by the victim herself — the philanthropic wife of L.L. Bean’s late president — has united local residents in outrage.

To make matters worse, the herbicide used to poison the trees leached into a neighboring park and the town’s only public seaside beach. The state attorney general is now investigating.

“Anybody dumb enough to poison trees right next to the ocean should be prosecuted, as far as I’m concerned,” said Paul Hodgson, echoing the view of many exasperated residents in Camden, a community of 5,000 nestled at the foot of mountains that sweep upward from the Atlantic Ocean and overlook a harbor filled with lobster boats, yachts and schooners.

Amelia Bond, former CEO of the St. Louis Foundation, which oversees charitable funds with more than $500 million in assets, brought the herbicide from Missouri in 2021 and applied it near oak trees on the waterfront property of Lisa Gorman, wife of the late Leon Gorman, L.L. Bean’s president and grandson of L.L. himself, according to a pair of consent agreements with the town and the state pesticide board.

Bond’s husband, Arthur Bond III, is an architect and the nephew of former U.S. Sen. Kit Bond. Their summer home, owned by a trust, is situated directly behind Gorman’s home, farther up the hill.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Their summer home, owned by a trust, is situated directly behind Gorman’s home, farther up the hill.

    Poisoned someone else’s trees, their property, and the beach and it was just for their summer home. :smh:

    Throw the book at them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      An open and shut case as far as I can tell. You don’t have the right to destroy other people’s property.

        • nezbyte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          5 months ago

          They could be fined a small amount for cutting down the trees and then include a provision that the trees must be replaced with trees of the same size. If they were large trees, then that could get super expensive very quickly. There was a story about tree law on Reddit where someone cut down 32 trees on their neighbor’s property and were charged $1k each plus the cost of replanting, it ended up just shy of $2M.

          • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah. You don’t mess with tree law. Since there’s no guarantee that the trees transported will take and it has to be done again.

            The poisoned water way is a new twist on the old I’m an idiot who’s going to pay dearly for my hubris motif.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not my area of expertise, I’m afraid. I just know it’s illegal to damage other people’s property. That’s just basic property rights.

      • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No they don’t. But they probably have the right wealth to get out of it with a fine that’s probably less than whatever interest is generated by their smallest savings account

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Throw the book at them.

      It’s extremely unlikely that this can be pinned on “them”. People this rich never do their own dirty work and give orders in ways that are deniable. Only exceptions are control freaks and idiots.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        IANAL but I didn’t think you can hire someone to commit a crime for you without exposing yourself to a lot of liability. People are certainly prosecuted for hiring someone else to commit murder.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Except murder is always illegal. Spraying pesticides can be legal. They could claim they just hired someone to spray pesticides and it was that person’s responsibility to check the legality or other bullshit to avoid responsibility.

          • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can delegate responsibility but not accountability. The owners would still be accountable.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    They are rich so they’ll reach an agreement between themselves likely before allowing application of the full extent of the law

    However there should likely be state agencies or the EPA involved and directly penalizing them. They better not back off on it.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Replace the mature trees at any cost. If those don’t “take” do it again.

      And again. And again. Until the soil accepts the fully mature trees.

      Onve they’ve lost millions, I hope they’ll serve as a proper cautionary tale.

      • brlemworld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Right, they should personally hand dig a tree of equal size and pay for it to be transported and installed and cared for. As well as proper disposal of the poisoned tree and the surrounding areas that were poisoned. At the end they should have a nice view of the tree.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    If the punishment for a crime is a set fine, then it is a law that targets only the poor; the wealthy will just pay that fine with the spare pennies at the bottom of their pocket as “a cost of doing business” and move on like nothing ever happened.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Are you a bot? This answer is so generic and not even addressing OP.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          There is no Karma on Lemmy. You don’t need to add the “It’s just a fine for them. A business expense.”-comment on every other post related to capitalism. I’ve seen this exact comment a billion times and never has it added any value to the thread.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            But if I stop seeing those comments then I’ll have to start making them. Easier to just vote my approval and be glad someone’s done it.

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            A repetition of the truth is always valuable. Not everyone fully understands how broken our society is. Even if just 0.1% read the comment and understand something new, it was valuable. Even if it’s just a reminder, it was valuable.

            On the other hand, your comment is not valuable 100% of the time. Complaining about something generally true being there, which you could just ignore if you already know it, is absolutely useless. In fact, it’s even negative value, because if your complaint was followed and someone came to the thread without the knowledge, they’d be denied an opportunity to learn.

  • supercargo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    How dare they mess with the 'Beans.

    I hope they get to smash that house down with their giant boot.

    • Dendr0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      After the Beans sold out to corporatize and join the “cheap shit from overseas” party, their name has lost a lot of meaning. It’s good to see the OG family being philanthropic, but that doesn’t negate them selling out.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh entirely, but if you’re going to do something, do it right and without externalities

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m more of a “do the crime, do the time” kind of person. Especially when it’s rich fucks who somehow believe they don’t have to pay a price for for being assholes.

          • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Believe it or not, I’m of the same mindset. I’m just saying if you are going to do something shitty, do it right, keep it within the situation, and don’t make it random other people’s problems.

            Like if you’ve got a beef with someone, walk up and punch them, and go about your day (after the ensuing fist fight). Don’t break tear gas and make everyone on the block pay because you’re mad at one person.