• puppy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            106
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Contender? He should’ve been the president in 2016. Democrats had to fuck that up. Trump won mostly because people hated Hilary.

            • snooggums@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              52
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              4 months ago

              Hilary won the popular vote by almost 3 million because most people liked her.

              She lost the electoral college vote because of a few really close states.

              • puppy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                57
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, against a playboy who didn’t have any political experience or acumen whatsoever. This should’ve been a landslide victory for dems. I stand by what I said, Trump won because it was Hilary he was up against. If it were Bernie, Trump wouldn’t have had a chance.

                • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  36
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Even my dad, a blue collar welder in his late 60s, was totally on the Bernie train in 2016. If that doesn’t tell you anything about how Bernie could have done, I don’t know what will.

              • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                A few states that were really close because her campaign was up against a social-media heavy campaign that weaponized misinformation, and didn’t know how to respond.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                4 months ago

                She lost the electoral college because she rigged the primary.

                In retrospect the margin was so thin that if she’d only modestly pissed off Sanders voters she would have won.

            • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Hilary was beating the rapist with 34 felonies ass in the polls. The shit stain won because people thought it was a landslide and didn’t need to vote. That won’t happen again. She still won popular vote, something a republikkklown hasn’t done in a hot minute.

              Edit: Looks like facts hurt some snowflakes feelings.

              • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                The reasons Hillary lost in 2016 are varied.

                • Poor GoTV operations in WI, MI, and PA.
                • Comey fucking her over with a GOP October Surprise.
                • People didn’t know what they would get with Trump. They were saying he’d turn Presidential for YEARS after he was elected. (He never did…)
                • Hillary having a faint smell of corruption around her, mostly concocted by Team Trump.
                • Russian Troll Farms filled with dipshits who worked overtime to fan dissention amongst the Left and Centre while empowering Team Trump.
                • Targeted Troll attacks in Swing States, specifically WI, MI, and PA, that Hillary wasn’t paying attention to.

                Even with all that going on, she did end up as the Winningest Losing Candidate in American history. I HOPE that they are going 50 State Strategy this time around. Trolls look for weak points that they can attack.

            • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Nah, Hilary was a fine choice despite her own personal and political issues. Despite not preferring her, I am rather confident that she would have not made a bad President. Perhaps not a good one, just also not a bad one.

              Fucking shame what happened. Oi, Chaps! I say we bloody up this wanker with a side o’ voting!

              Sorry, channeling my stereotypical inner mocking British man.

              Edit: I stand by what I said unless given compelling reasons to not do so. Maybe I’m remembering things incorrectly. It’s been awhile. Make a case, don’t care if it’s a legitimate link. I’m happy to do a learn.

            • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 months ago

              He wasn’t a Democratic Party member in 2016. He caucused and partnership with them but if he’s not going to be in the party, nobody should be surprised that he’s not the parties pick or preference. He didn’t officially join them until 2019. The circumstances might not have worked but be real the Democrats didn’t fuck it up in 2016.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Unfortunately Bernie’s leftist policies posed a slight risk to a small percentage of capital. So an all-out bipartisan effort to torpedo him ensued, and from the ashes emerged Planet Hillary.

          • qprimed@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think Bernie is a pretty smart guy. he knows where he can be most effective - no trajectory change needed.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think everyone who had their name pushed and could have a chance at the convention has already endorsed Kamala Harris. They’re pretty obviously trying to avoid a contentious convention.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          That seems to be the goal. I think it’s a good idea to not go too hard on Harris until the convention, but the excitement seems there.

      • The25002@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah it’s a point they’re allowed to make now, don’t know how well it’s really going to stick though. However so far the best republicans have against Kamala is that she… Laughs? That’s a good sign. Like a lot of the stuff people like me on the left have against Kamala is stuff republicans wouldn’t want to at her for.

      • Codex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I still really want AOC but with Whitmer bowing out I think Buttigiege is probably it.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Harris is a black woman. No way they’re picking a gay man as her running mate. They’re worried she has too much for the (X)phobic crowd on her own. I would be absolutely shocked if whoever they pick as her VP isn’t a straight white man. You can say what you like about it but that’s the reality of where we are as a nation.

          • Bizzle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The kind of people who would not vote for Harris because she’s a Black woman were already going to vote for Trump.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              There are absolutely people who are not concerned enough with race or gender to vote for a black woman but are still homophobic. Who knows how many people that is but I would bet a lot of money that the DNC has no intention of finding out.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yet dropping out didn’t make him a single day younger. He’s still too old.

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          How would you know??? I bet it did!

          COVID, my ass, Biden been drinking from the fountain of youth. Any day now, he’ll become unborn and lay in stasis until ready to be birthed for his next presidential run in 2077 during which he’ll battle Mecha-Reagan!

          If you don’t believe me, ask my neighbor’s dog. They’re the one who told me all this. Crafty damn dog…

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    He is too old, but like, if a 90 year old hitler were running for president i wouldnt be saying im not voting for him because of his age. Trump has been the worst parts of humanity for decades.

  • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Dementia Don, the racist rapist with 34 felonies that can’t complete a coherent sentence is too old. He needs to drop out, it’s just embarrassing at this point.

  • troglodytis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wait wait, the Democrats, who said Biden was too old and stopped giving $ to Biden’s campaign are being consistent in their message? Well I’ll be damned.

      • troglodytis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep. And the primaries are a great time to do just that.

        But Biden didn’t drop out because of the uncommitted movement.

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe, but that’s because the rest of us did think he was to old. One doesn’t invalidate the other.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            The people who pulled the money felt he was likely to fail because of his age, or rather, the affects of it on his performance. If he had been killing it, he would still be in. However they didn’t pull their money because of him arming a genocidal regime, which is the issue that the comment I was replying to, was saying.

            • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              In 2020 I knew Biden was a Zionist, a racist, a warmonger and his issues page was anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian. But I was told Trump will be worse, so I begrudgingly voted for him and got a genocide.

              The same playbook cannot work again for Kamala Harris and I don’t think I am the only one who feels this way.

              You may want to prevent some imagined unicorn scenario that is unrealistic. I want to prevent this actual hell on Earth that Biden is enabling. Watch the doctor’s interview with CBS or just the short segment I just linked to, then tell me again about voting for someone who supports “Israel’s right to defend itself” and doesn’t think there should be conditions on it.

              • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Hallmarks of an internet troll - a user which makes no meaningful contributions, or engages meaningfully with any other topics other than political agitation. In this case we have pages and pages of history revolving around using Gaza as a cudgel against Democrats, and literally nothing else.

                • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Ad hominem. If you aren’t going to watch this and develop a better understanding of what the Democratic Party has enabled so be it.

                  But understand that the people you despise and dehumanize the most can still swing the election, perhaps treating them as humans is a good first step. Instead our anger is demonized too.

                  In Michigan, for example, Biden won in 2020 by 154,000 votes. Census estimates put the state’s Arab American population around at least 278,000.

                  Biden won Arizona by 10,500 votes. The Arab American population in the Grand Canyon State is estimated to be 60,000.

                  Biden took Georgia by 11,800 votes. The Arab American population there is at least 57,000.

                  You know, I could keep quiet and just not vote for Biden or Harris. I am the idiot who is wasting his time on people who don’t even see us as humans. You do realize this makes it even harder for the Democratic Party in future elections?

              • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                “I don’t like what happened therefore the other option must have been better” is the kind of logic I’d expect from a two year old.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Getting a viable candidate that will spurn israel is not something that is going to happen any time soon. This will require a major cultural shift in the US, and that isn’t gonna happen easily. This is the sickening state of reality, life is cheap, and most people do not give a fuck.

            • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Honestly, if it’s a choice between me and some people I don’t know half a world away, I’m picking me. That goes twice when the choices are:

              • Pick the gal who will piss off the dictator to the point where he complains that he’s not getting enough bombs and missiles quick enough for his bloodthirstiness…like her former boss did.
              • Pick the guy who will hand more than enough bombs and missiles to kill every single Palestinian at least once, if not more than once, while grinding American Muslims under the bootheel of Right-Wing Authoritarianism.

              I’ll pick the gal every single fucking time.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    He confused Biden and Obama, Haley and Pelosi. Bizarre stuff spews from his mouth nearly every time he opens it. Where’s the outrage?

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    This really demonstrates a difference between democrats and republicans.

    Democrats cared about the hypocrisy of pointing out that the opponent candidate was too old, and only started saying this after this was no longer a problem.

    Republicans didn’t care that their candidate was also too old.

    • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 months ago

      His brain is even more broken than before. Watch the footage of MAGAts walking out of his rallies as he keeps repeating the same things and talking gibberish.

        • catbum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I hadn’t seen this before, and it was generally really enlightening that these Trump supporters have genuine concerns for the working class, obvious as that should be by now. It just sucks that they’ve been hoodwinked into thinking that Trump is their savior from the corporate oligarchy that is clearly affecting us all. Misplaced reverence to a guy who is a mechanism in the same pro-corporate atmosphere. If only they realized that the Democrat party (flawed as it is) actually works toward their interests with policy (edit: toward improving wages, taxing the ultra rich more fairly, healthcare ideally for all, social programs, etc.), rather than attaching themselves to this “not-a-career-politician” who couldn’t care less about them. Maybe not all hope is lost on trump supporters, but the cult of personality is much too strong and has been for a long time.

        • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I mean I saw nothing impressive there, just showing that people know they’re voting against their own interests and some ARE intelligent enough to know that but decide to not think about it.

        • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Is this a video showing problems about Trump, or just problems with our whole system regardless of the “leadership”

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      And not just normal age related broken. Though age hasn’t really improved the situation.

  • Hawanja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean, he is too old. He’s only 3 years younger than Biden. So if the narrative here is that Biden is too old, then so is Trump.

    • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      That three years makes a big difference to Trump voters, that is the difference between “Frowned Upon” and 18 years old.

    • bmeffer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      He is only the candidate because of DEI. It would be discrimination to disqualify him based on his advanced age. Damn DEI.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      We already TRIED electing a president who was a year younger than Trump is right now and even then, it SUCKED! Thank goodness there’s no reason we ever have to make that stupid, bone headed, silly mistake ever again…

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      4 months ago

      The objection to Biden was his infirmity and obvious mental degradation. People were saying he had early onset dementia in 2019. Trump has neither of these issues. He can stand and talk for hours. He was shot and got back up. He’s healthy.

      • golden_calf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        So you’ve never actually listened to one of his speeches then have you? He can’t maintain a train of thought and usually doesn’t finish a sentence before going off track and never finishing. He fell asleep at his own trial. He is absolutely too old and does all the things they accused Biden of. Biden was too old, so is Trump.

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          4 months ago

          Trump is old but he’s got all his marbles. Sorry. You just don’t like him and want him to lose which is fine.

            • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Underestimating your political opponent

              Clearly a student of Sun Tzu

              • medgremlin@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                I think considering Donald Trump to have any significant degree of intelligence or political acumen is an overestimation. The Cult of the GOP is a concern and I am worried about how many people have cast aside all sense of empathy and humanity in favor of supporting Trump, but the man himself is little more than a demagogue with a recognizable name.

                • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You’re right he’s super dumb and not a threat at all. It’s only his handlers.

      • ben_dover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        my grandad can stand and talk for hours, that doesn’t mean his ramblings would make any sense, or that he could run our country

        • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Actually you’re right. Don’t worry about Trump. He’s senile and doesn’t stand a chance. Kamala totally has it in the bag.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Jesus Fred Christ what are the photo editors doing?

    Every trump article has an ever-more-close-up even-greasier horror picture of his sociopathic rapist fraud face. Man, nobody wants to see that shit!

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Is that from old age or years of hard drug abuse? You may be off topic with your diaper fact… which is crazy to think about since he has been a serious contender in three presidential elections. 🤦‍♀️

      • nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        there’s a lot of things you can say about trump but he’s actually a t-totaller afaik

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are multiple pictures of Turd sitting down where it’s painfully obvious he is wearing a diaper.

        Normally there is nothing wrong with that, but he, and everyone who votes R, is a piece of shit and was mocking Biden for his age with diapers. Have never seen a photo of Biden like that.

        Also, it was one of those unconfirmed by everyone in the White House and who works with Turd that he shits himself constantly.

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you Google the debate something like an hour 18 or so you can hear him pause mid sentence shit and continue as if that was normal.

    • StaySquared@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      I love how you try to revise history when it was Biden, caught on camera, during a ceremony in France, who apparently shat his pants.

      LOL fkin revisionists are amazing. I swear.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    if you aint fit for working after 65+, you shouldnt be fit to be a fucking president

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is there a nursing home prison? Because Trump belongs in prison, and maybe his age and poor health will save some taxpayer money.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Specifically, their own homes. Both are rich enough to afford private duty nursing.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re being weirdly pedantic. Biden is still just as old as he was, so he’s still too old to run. If some other octogenarian stepped up and said he’d like to run I would say he’s too old too.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        (is there some sort of bot swarm happening here)

        Welcome to Lemmy politics 🙂

        I won’t say bots specifically. But yes, there is a PALPABLE tide of accounts that are just going to muster the least-bullshit reason they can find to oppose the idea of the Democrats being good or worth voting for, and repeat it relentlessly, even if the least-bullshit they can come up with doesn’t even approximate making sense. And they never shut up. They’re just sort of stuck on Biden right now because the new Harris talking points aren’t fully marshaled yet.

        Have fun! Try to enjoy it. I like using them to tee up extensive explanations of what is good and right in politics, that would be weird and partisan if I just showed up and started announcing them.

        HEY DID YOU KNOW BIDEN SPENT HALF A TRILLION OF AMAZON.COM’S DOLLARS ON FIGHTING CLIMATE CHANGE? That’s almost ten times what any other US politician has ever done, and that was back in 2009

        See it’s weird if it just comes out of nowhere

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Someone can still be old even if they aren’t running for president. Nothing in the statement implies or relies on biden still running for president, just that he is old. He still is. It’s ok to still think about people even when they aren’t in the news anymore, they didn’t go away.

  • Kabloink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    Makes sense, If 81 is too old, 78 is probably too old too. After all, Trump would be 81 during his presidency if he wins.