Rightwing playbooks used in past election campaigns are being dusted off for an all-out assault on the vice-president

For Barack Obama there was “birtherism” and a name they said sounded like a specific Middle East terrorist. For Hillary Clinton there was “Lock her up” and merchandise that said, “Trump that bitch”, “Hillary sucks but not like Monica” and “Life’s a bitch: don’t vote for one.”

Rightwing playbooks deployed in past election campaigns are being dusted off for an all-out assault against Vice-President Kamala Harris, the de facto Democratic nominee aiming to become the first Black woman and first person of south Asian descent to be US president.

It’s obvious that the Republicans are going to play the race and gender card, which we’ve seen already in some of the attacks on social media,” said Tara Setmayer, a Black woman who is co-founder and chief executive of the Seneca Project, a women-led super political action committee. “It may be catnip for their Maga base but it will be a turnoff for the moderate voters in the battleground states that will determine this election.”

  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    To be fair the Democrats don’t have a platform other than

    I’m sorry you’re ignorant. But the good news is that you can actually do something about. Go ahead! Give it a try.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah, I saw her speech to the DNC the other day. She used a bunch of weasel words like “affordable” healthcare, “middle class” , assault weapons ban, etc. These things range from meaningless to barely a move in the right direction. Y’all got tricked into thinking the conservative corporate candidate is so progressive because she is compared to the fascist option. It’s a bunch of B.S.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        And I suppose you have a viable alternative non-incrementalist approach that is going to be appealing to the majority of voters.

          • enbyecho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            Take control of the DNC away from the center right and get progressives in charge.

            And in your mind does that get more or less votes overall? Does it actually win elections?

            Because incredibly, not everyone is progressive. I know, it’s insane to me too. But that’s the unfortunate reality.

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s almost as if they’re saying things like universal healthcare can’t win elections and instead need to seize power from the top down. Which really undersells the appeal of these programs.

              • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m saying I want universal healthcare and Dems won’t do it. They want to give health insurance companies and private hospitals a shitton of taxpayers money and keep insurance tied to employment. It’s a crock of shit.