• darcy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    theres no actual reason more than curiosity. dont get me started on colonization of other planets

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Asteroid mining would mean no more mining on our planet, which is one of the most polluting things on here right now.

      • darcy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        its basically impossible to sustain a reasonably sized population on mars. like antarctica, except it takes like 18 months or something to get there. i dont believe that anything as dramatic as terraforming is practical or even possible. who will be allowed to go to mars? most likely only the rich. why dont we invest more money and resources into fixing our current planet? overpopulation can be avoided if we plan cities better, advocate contraception, etc. certainly more believable than sending a large portion of people to another whole planet. even if we could: should we? it would create a massive social divide. and who is running this whole thing? so far it seems like elon musk is the most mainstream advocator of this idea. would you like if your entire planet was owned by him. good luck forming a union on sector 7 of the oxygen plantation.

        • Serdan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          who will be allowed to go to mars? most likely only the rich.

          Living on Mars would be miserable. If colonization ever happens, it’ll be because there’s money to be made, and it’ll be poor people who are send to die in the Mars mines or whatever.

        • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dont believe that anything as dramatic as terraforming is practical or even possible.

          I’d also like to add that the amount you’d need to terraphorm Mars you could just… do to Earth. I think a lot of the points you made are valid, but some of those questions are pretty hypothetical.

          Idk, I think it’d be neat for humanity to go off planet and extrasolar. Even if it’s not a priority, you can’t really do that unless you’re working towards it. Doesn’t really matter to me regardless, I’ll be long dead before it happens.

          • darcy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            you could just… do to Earth

            exactly. but spacex d***riders who believe mars is the future are retarded

            • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I have no disagreement beyond your description of them. I agree that they’re sycophantic dipshits.

              Like, Mars doesn’t have a magnetosphere. How the fuck do you make one of those? How do you make the gravity stronger?

    • akulium@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      what do you even live for if curiosity is not enough of a reason to do something

        • nicman24@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          put your phone down and start working the fields. you do not deserve anything that came out of space programs.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know there is a thing called division of labour right?

          We can have people working on multiple problems at the same time and various efforts might overlap and have a larger effect.

          You are now aware of this concept.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Colonization, if ever possible, definitely is a good reason

      Other good reasons are simply science. There are too many advancements made that would not have happened without going to space. Having satellites is a requirement now to monitor the earth and -if still possible- save it.

      Of course there are bullshit projects like star link, dumping hundreds, thousands of tiny shit satellites up on the sky even though it’s completely unnecessary… but that is a rich asshole problem more than a space problem