• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s complicated. Hamas won a majority of seats in Palestine’s parliament in 2006, but Fatah didn’t like that. There was a bit of a civil war, and it ended up with Hamas controlling Gaza and Fatah controlling the West Bank. There haven’t been any elections since. So no, Hamas doesn’t represent all of Palestine, but they were democratically elected in 2006. They are in control of Gaza, but neither the West Bank, nor both territories as one Palestine. Really, there is no united Palestine right now. And I’m sure Israel is very happy to keep it that way.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Palestinian_legislative_election

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      And I’m sure Israel is very happy to keep it that way.

      It also seems like the people in charge of the split groups are happy to keep it that way. I’m sure there’s a substantial amount of foreign influence, but it looks like neither PNA or PLO have had elections since 2006. PNA under Hamas clearly has some religious/military motivations that they play out with authoritarian style, but it seems that the current leadership of the PLO has inherited Arafat’s financial empire:

      According to a 1993 report by the British National Criminal Intelligence Service, the PLO was “the richest of all terrorist organizations”, with $8–$10 billion in assets and an annual income of $1.5–$2 billion from “donations, extortion, payoffs, illegal arms dealing, drug trafficking, money laundering, fraud, etc.” Estimates of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s alleged hidden assets vary wildly and only Arafat had the whole picture. A former PLO finance minister said it was $3 billion to $5 billion.

      So why would they be interested in sharing/dividing control of that? Israel is probably fanning the flames of the internal divisions, but I bet the self-interest of the leaders of the various groups carries more weight.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      They were pretty fast from a majority in 2006. So they may have been democratically elected but it was not by most Palestinians.