I was shocked in the presidential debate that Harris gave staunch support for fracking. I was under the impression that democrats are against fracking, and remember people being critical of Fetterman for supporting it.

I also grew up in an area that was heavily impacted by the pollution from fracking. People who worked in the field were seen as failures of moral character who chose profits over the health of their children. How is it that both major parties are now in support of it? I feel like I must be missing a piece of the puzzle.

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      1·
      3 months ago

      That does sound better doesn’t it? If I were a presidential candidate, I would definitely say “We support fracking because we need Pennsylvania” instead of “We support fracking because our campaign has accepted millions of dollars from the oil industry”.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        2·
        3 months ago

        Any commentary I’ve heard is talking about Pennsylvania. It’s critically important to a win, and fracking is critically important to voters there.

        That said, can’t it be both?

        I’m sure both campaigns have accepted donations from loads of shady industries. Crypto is a salient example.

        Money wins elections, and the race being as close as it is I don’t care where the dems are getting their money from.

        I find myself saying this a lot, but if the left was going to win a convincing victory, they would have some scope for more progressive policy. There isn’t any room, and they don’t have that mandate.