• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The original toot clarified that they were talking about direct measurements only (but evidence exists that this is the warmest period in the last 125,000 years).

        • Glitchington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, approximation is not a record therefore we cannot consider it a factor at all, regardless of it being our best estimate given our current data. You’re right, let’s throw it all out and opt for ignorance. 🙄

          • sadreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            i suggested no such thing, you made that last part up for yourself.

            i am just highlighting that comparing data from different sources/methods of collection is not proper apples to apples comparison. but sure have a melt down over it lol

            • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sure we would take ice samples from the modern era, ya know if any new ice was being deposited. Other systems are pretty easy to correlate 1:1.

              Just because something isn’t digital doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist or we can’t take observations from it.

              • sadreality@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t mean digital. Just daily readings with a thermometer across the globe v 1cm or whatever per year of a core reading for that location or a few of them.