Basically the title

  • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    but users would, for the most part, not tolerate removing the ability to boot any OS they feel like, so there’s enough pressure that locked shit won’t migrate down to all consumer hardware.

    what makes you think that?

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The same reason people who drive 20 miles a day have worries about range on an EV that’ll do 300, or why people espouse the freedom of Android but then use the default Google apps.

      People like the option of choice, even if they’re not necessarily ever going to engage in making a different one.

      If there are two options for a computer, one is “will run everything” and the other is “will only run Windows” a good portion of people are still going to pick the first, even though very few of them will ever do anything else, simply because people really really like having the option of choice.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think they even know that there’s a possible choice. Common people don’t understand computers, not at this level.

        Cars is a good example for another reason. Do we have new cars without a built-in internet connection and continuous user (and environment) tracking, and questionable remote control functions? Afaik we don’t.