Another remaster that misses the point

Today Blizzard announced remasters of its classic fantasy real-time strategy hits Warcraft I&II, the games that put it on the map in the distant, functional past of the ‘90s. I should be celebrating; the second Warcraft as unequivocally my favorite game as a young child. I spent God only knows how many hundreds of hours playing it, and even He eventually got bored of watching me make my own horrible little maps and walked away. These remasters, though? They ain’t it.

I’ll preface this by saying that I’m very glad these classics remain playable. I’m sure Blizzard’s making a pretty penny off doing so, but at least it’s keeping its history alive. That said, I will be playing these re-releases with the new graphics turned off, because just look at them:

Warcraft Remastered Battle Chest Launch Trailer

The art looks basic and generic where the original pixels inspired imagination, letting your mind fill in the gaps of these units’ physical features. Some, like Ogres and Ogre Magi, appeared almost photorealistic to young me, who sought to recreate them (over and over and over) in drawings and other, larger-scale art projects. In trying to more fully inhabit this universe whose collection of Little Guys inspired me to dare to dream, I constructed life-sized (relative to an eight-year-old) paper dolls of nearly every unit in the game. It was my Everest, entirely because – again – the original game left room for interpretation.

Now admittedly, I’m no longer a small child fueled entirely by starry-eyed wonder, and that’s definitely part of the problem. But Warcraft’s original look was a product of its limitations, and trying to pave over that with plastic-y sheen is a mistake. I don’t know who the new graphics are for – I doubt these old games are going to lure in many new players, especially with art that looks like it belongs in a vastly less-intricate game than Warcraft – but it’s certainly not me.

        • Viri4thus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          12 days ago

          You could only vote for fascists. One personable, one arse-hole, both as fascist as they come.

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            An unironic “both sides”. How original.

            I have no intentions of looking at your profile, so I’ll assume you’re joking. Because I prefer that option.

            In either case, one of those candidates will be worse for Palestinians, LGBTQ folks, women, the climate, etc… I actually care about those groups and causes.

            • Viri4thus@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              12 days ago

              Lol, quite literally this week Biden went back on his word on the export block of weapons to Israel. From the outside looking in, there’s no difference.

              • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                12 days ago

                So even if I were to grant that on Israel/Palestine they were no different (which I don’t), we’re going to throw all of those other groups and causes under the bus?

                • Viri4thus@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 days ago

                  The fact they are in contention after 4y is evidence enough they mean jack shit for either side. Once they are codified into law they lose value in attracting single issue voters like you. I reiterate, from the outside looking in, same same. There’s a reason even though AOC saw good congressional results personally, her district swung wildly red for the presidential results. I just can’t wrap my head around backstabbing Bernie to nominate a female Kissinger for an election and 8y later you’re still paying the price. There’s no left in the US, just far right and further right…

                  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    single issue voters like you

                    Proof you either aren’t arguing in good faith, or you have the reading and comprehension skills of a dehydrated snail.

                    I have no interest in continuing this.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, this took a quick turn into Godwin’s Law faster than I’ve ever seen.

        I don’t know anything about Grayson or why someone would have an issue with him, but you’ve made it very clear very quickly that you’re not providing view points worth looking into, so thank you for that.

        • Viri4thus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          12 days ago

          Not only do you not know what Goodwin’s law is, you took time to reply to a worthless take? How little do you value your time and opinions that you’d go out of your way to deride mine?