If true that does not bode well. The system requirements were already suspicious but very late review embargo is a huge red flag.
Sad, they made some fun games namely steamworld heist. They grew a bit too much and too fast.
They first have to identity a key player to purchase first and then run the product into the ground.
“Metro dev sad his game isn’t sell enough” I’m okay missing a few gems if the price of entry is a thousand dollars if I want to avoid meta spyware.
Dragon Age Veilguard shouldn’t have been like that either.
It’s certainly “new” by the looks of it, maybe too “new” for many Origin fans.
I think only Dragon Age Origins knew what it was.
Those rayman ideas should involve putting the old games on steam with some minor tweaks to make them play better and achievements.
Shitty company justifies it’s existence*
If they could retroactively add steam achievements to their old games and maybe add rayman 1 and 2 to the steam store that would be nice.
No I don’t like real world money gambling in my video games.
Bethesda: “We can’t do anything outside of American, it doesn’t fit the lore and aesthetic”
Proceeds to make garbage fallout games
Modders: “Hold my fallout 1”
Keysites still have it for about what the original was going for on an average sale. Then you can do an upgrade to the remaster for $15 so it’s like 50% less than buying the new remaster.
Decentralized anonymous emulator development here we go.
EA on the AI slopwagon but good games nowhere to be seen.
Modern Bethesda and making good games, what a joke.
Chasing graphics has lead to directions nobody could predict and I’m glad I don’t play these games.
The rules and the preferences of the judges or what has not won before makes Game of the Year look kinda like shit. Like indie games and fps games without narrative have no chance?
Man really wants that AI hype money.
I don’t think i’d say it’s a return to it’s roots based on the writing.